Skip to main content

Combinations of SDC Methods for Microdata Protection

  • Conference paper
Privacy in Statistical Databases (PSD 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4302))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A number of methods have been proposed in the literature for masking (protecting) microdata. Nearly all of these methods may be implemented with different degrees of intensity, by setting the value of an appropriate parameter. However, even parameter variation may not be sufficient to realize appropriate levels of disclosure risk and data utility. In this paper we propose a new approach to protection of numerical microdata: applying multiple stages of masking to the data in a way that increases utility but controls disclosure risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anwar, N.: Micro-aggregation—the small aggregates method, Research Report. Eurostat, Luxembourg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brand, R.: Microdata protection through noise. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J. (ed.) Inference Control in Statistical Databases. LNCS, vol. 2316, pp. 97–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalenius, T., Reiss, S.P.: Data-swapping: A technique for disclosure control. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 6, 73–85 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Defays, D., Anwar, N.: Micro-aggregation: a generic method. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Statistical Confidentiality, pp. 69–78. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Defays, D., Nanopoulos, P.: Panels of enterprises and confidentiality: the small aggregates method. In: Proceedings of the 92 Symposium on Design and Analysis of Longitudinal Surveys, pp. 195–204. Statistics Canada, Ottawa (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dobra, A., Fienberg, S.E., Karr, A.F., Sanil, A.P.: Software systems for tabular data releases. International Journal on Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems 10(5), 529–544 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Mateo-Sanz, J.M.: On resampling for statistical confidentiality in contingency tables. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 38, 13–32 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Mateo-Sanz, J.M., Oganian, A., Torres, A.: On the security of microaggregation with individual ranking: analytical attacks. International Journal on Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems 10(5), 477–492 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Mateo-Sanz, J.M., Torra, V.: Comparing SDC methods for microdata on the basis of information loss and disclosure risk of disclosure control methods. In: Proc. of ETK–NTTS 2002, pp. 807–825. Eurostat, Luxembourg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gomatam, S., Karr, A.F., Sanil, A.P.: Data swapping as a decision problem. Journal of Official Statistics (to appear, 2006), available online at www.niss.org/dgii/technicalreports.html

  11. Jaro, M.A.: Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 Census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 414–420 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heer, G.R.: A Bootstrap procedure to preserve statistical confidentiality in contingency tables. In: Lievesley, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Seminar on Statistical Confidentiality, pp. 261–271. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karr, A.F., Kohnen, C.N., Oganian, A., Reiter, J.P., Sanil, A.P.: A framework for evaluating the utility of data altered to protect confidentiality. The American Statistician 60(3), 224–232 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, J.J.: A method for limiting disclosure in microdata based on random noise and transformation. In: Proceedings of the ASA Section on Survey Research Methodology, pp. 303–308. American Statistical Association, Alexandria VA (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kung, H.T., Luccio, F., Preparata, F.P.: On finding the maxima of a set of vectors. J. ACM 22, 469–476 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Little, R.J.A.: Statistical analysis of masked data. Journal of Official Statistics 9, 407–426 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mateo-Sanz, J.M., Domingo-Ferrer, J.: A method for data-oriented multivariate microaggregation. In: Proceedings of Statistical Data Protection 1998, pp. 89–99. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moor, R.: Controlled data swapping techniques for masking public use microdata sets. U.S. Census Bureau (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oganian, A.: Security and Information Loss in Statistical Database Protection. Ph. D. thesis, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oganian, A., Domingo-Ferrer, J.: On the complexity of optimal microaggregation for statistical disclosure control. Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 18(4), 345–353 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pagliuca, D., Seri, G.: Some results of individual ranking method on the system of enterprise accounts annual survey. Esprit SDC Project, Deliverable MI-3/D2 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sullivan, G., Fuller, W.A.: The use of measurement error to avoid disclosure. In: Proceedings of the ASA Section on Survey Research Methodology, pp. 802–807. American Statistical Association, Alexandria VA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tendik, P., Matloff, N.: A modified random perturbation method for database security. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 19(1), 47–63 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Woo, M.-J., Reiter, J.P., Oganian, A., Karr, A.F.: Global measures of data usefulness for microdata altered for disclosure limitation. Technical Report, National Institute of Statistical Sciences (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yancey, W.E., Winkler, W.E., Creecy, R.H.: Disclosure risk assessment in perturbative microdata protection. In: Domingo-Ferrer (ed.) Inference Control in Statistical Databases, pp. 135–152. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oganian, A., Karr, A.F. (2006). Combinations of SDC Methods for Microdata Protection. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., Franconi, L. (eds) Privacy in Statistical Databases. PSD 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4302. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11930242_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11930242_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49330-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49332-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics