Skip to main content

Homogeneity vs. Adjacency: Generalising Some Graph Decomposition Algorithms

  • Conference paper
Book cover Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4271))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, a new general decomposition theory inspired from modular graph decomposition is presented. Our main result shows that, within this general theory, most of the nice algorithmic tools developed for modular decomposition are still efficient.

This theory not only unifies the usual modular decomposition generalisations such as modular decomposition of directed graphs and of 2-structures, but also decomposition by star cutsets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allauzen, C., Mohri, M.: Efficient algorithms for testing the twins property. Journal of Automata, Languages and Combinatorics 8(2), 117–144 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bioch, J.: The complexity of modular decomposition of boolean functions. Discrete Applied Mathematics 149(1-3), 1–13 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bui Xuan, B.-M., Habib, M., Paul, C.: Revisiting T. Uno and M. Yagiura’s Algorithm. In: Deng, X., Du, D.-Z. (eds.) ISAAC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3827, pp. 146–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Capelle, C., Habib, M., de Montgolfier, F.: Graph decomposition and factorizing permutations. D.M.T.C.S. 5(1), 55–70 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chein, M., Habib, M., Maurer, M.C.: Partitive hypergraphs. Discrete Mathematics 37(1), 35–50 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cournier, A., Habib, M.: A new linear algorithm for modular decomposition. In: Tison, S. (ed.) CAAP 1994. LNCS, vol. 787. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahlhaus, E.: Parallel algorithms for hierarchical clustering, and applications to split decomposition and parity graph recognition. Journal of Algorithms 36(2), 205–240 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dahlhaus, E., Gustedt, J., McConnell, R.M.: Efficient and practical algorithms for sequential modular decomposition. Journal of Algorithms 41(2), 360–387 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrenfeucht, A., Rozenberg, G.: Theory of 2-structures. Theoretical Computer Science 3(70), 277–342 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujishige, S.: Submodular Functions and Optimization. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallai, T.: Transitiv orientierbare Graphen. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 18, 25–66 (1967)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Habib, M., Paul, C., Viennot, L.: Partition refinement techniques: An interesting algorithmic tool kit. I.J.F.C.S. 10(2), 147–170 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. McConnell, R.M., de Montgolfier, F.: Linear-time modular decomposition of directed graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics 145(2), 189–209 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McConnell, R.M., Spinrad, J.P.: Modular decomposition and transitive orientation. Discrete Maths. 201, 189–241 (1999); Extended abstract at SODA 1994

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Möhring, R.H., Radermacher, F.J.: Substitution decomposition for discrete structures and connections with combinatorial optimization. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 19, 257–356 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paige, R., Tarjan, R.E.: Three partition refinement algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 16(6), 973–989 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Uno, T., Yagiura, M.: Fast algorithms to enumerate all common intervals of two permutations. Algorithmica 26(2), 290–309 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xuan, B.M.B., Habib, M., Limouzy, V., de Montgolfier, F. (2006). Homogeneity vs. Adjacency: Generalising Some Graph Decomposition Algorithms. In: Fomin, F.V. (eds) Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science. WG 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4271. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11917496_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11917496_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-48381-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48382-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics