Skip to main content

An Industry-Based Evaluation of Process Modeling Techniques

  • Conference paper
Software Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4257))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 695 Accesses

Abstract

There are many ways to model software development processes. This paper reports a feature analysis of four process modeling techniques using criteria specified by a software development organization. The evaluation used a single process, peer review, modeled using all four techniques. Performing the modeling activity highlighted the usefulness of the modeling activity and the usefulness of metamodels in structuring processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Henderson-Sellers, B., Collins, G., Due, R., Graham, I.: A Qualitative Comparison of Two Processes for Object-Oriented Software Development. Information and Software Technology 43, 705–724 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, A.I., Conradi, R., Thuv, C.: Framework for Evaluating Process Modelling Languages for Distributed Environments. In: Software Engineering and Applications, pp. 6–9. ACTA Press, Phoenix (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kitchenham, B.A.: Evaluating Software Engineering Methods and Tool – Part 1: The Evaluation Context and Evaluation Methods. ACM Software Engineering Notes 21(1), 11–15 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Firesmith, D., Henderson-Sellers, B.: The OPEN Process Framework. Addison-Wesley, Harlow (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification v1.1 – Object Management Group (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frank, J., Gardner, T., Johnston, S., White, S., Iyengar, S.: Business Process Definition Metamodel – Concepts and Overview. IBM whitepaper, Object Management Group, Needham, MA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engels, G., Groenewegen, L.: SOCCA: Specifications of Coordinated and Cooperative Activities. In: Software Process Modelling and Technology. Research Studies Press, Taunton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wiegers, K.E.: Peer Reviews in Software – A Practical Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. AS 4651-2004 Australian Standard – Standard Metamodel for Software Development Methodologies (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO/IEC, W.D.: 24744 (2005-12-23) Information Technology – Software Engineering – Metamodel for Development Methodologies (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cahill, B., Carrington, D., Song, B., Strooper, P. (2006). An Industry-Based Evaluation of Process Modeling Techniques. In: Richardson, I., Runeson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds) Software Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4257. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11908562_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11908562_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47695-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47696-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics