Skip to main content

Concept Modeling by the Masses: Folksonomy Structure and Interoperability

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4215))

Abstract

The recent popularity of social software in the wake of the much hyped “Web2.0” has resulted in a flurry of activity around folksonomies, the emergent systems of classification that result from making public the individual users’ personal classifications in the form of simple free form “tags”. Several approaches have emerged in the analysis of these folksonomies including mathematical approaches for clustering and identifying affinities, social theories about cultural factors in tagging, and cognitive theories about their mental underpinnings. In this paper we argue that the most useful analysis is in terms of mental phenomena since naive classification is essentially a cognitive task. We then describe a method for extracting structural properties of free form user tags, based on the linguistic properties of the tags. This reveals some deep insights in the conceptual modeling behavior of naive users. Finally we explore the usefulness of the latent structural properties of free form “tag clouds” for interoperability between folksonomies from different services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Levy, S., Stone, B.: The New Wisdom of the Web. Newsweek (April 3, 2006), http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12015774/site/newsweek/

  2. Boutin, P.: Web 2.0 The new Internet boom doesn’t live up to its name. Slate. Posted Wednesday (March 29, 2006), http://www.slate.com/id/2138951/

  3. Udell, J.: Collaborative knowledge gardening. InfoWorld (August 20, 2004), http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/20/34OPstrategic_1.html

  4. Vanderwall, T.: Explaining and Showing Broad and Narrow Folksonomies (February 21, 2005), http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1635

  5. Shen, K., Wu, L.: Folksonomy as a Complex Network. In: Computer Science. abstract cs.IR/0509072 (2005), http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.IR/0509072

  6. Speroni, P.: On Tag Clouds, Metric, Tag Sets and Power Laws (2005), http://blog.pietrosperoni.it/2005/05/25/tag-clouds-metric/

  7. Golder, S., Huberman, B.A.: The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems (2005), http://www.citebase.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:cs/0508082

  8. Grigory Begelman, G., Keller, P., Smadja, F.: Automated Tag Clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space. In: Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop, 15 th International World Wide Web Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Veres, C.: Emerging Patterns (February 7, 2006), http://csabaveres.net/blog8/?p=7

  10. Jackendoff, R.: Semantics and Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shirky, C.: Matt Locke on folksonomies (March 01, 2005), http://many.corante.com/archives/2005/03/01/matt_locke_on_folksonomies.php

  12. Hearst, M.: Clustering versus Faceted Categories for Information Exploration. Communications of the ACM 49(4) (April 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Veres, C.: The Language of Folksonomies: What tags reveal about user classification. In: Kop, C., Fliedl, G., Mayr, H.C., Métais, E. (eds.) NLDB 2006. LNCS, vol. 3999, pp. 58–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Barsalou, Lawrence, W.: Deriving categories to achieve goals. In: Bower, G. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Academic Press, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wierzbicka, A.: Apples are not a ’kind of fruit’: the semantics of human categorization. American Ethnologist, 313–328 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gruber, T.: Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges, 4 edn. (January 19, 2006), http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-of-folksonomy.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Veres, C. (2006). Concept Modeling by the Masses: Folksonomy Structure and Interoperability. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006. ER 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47224-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47227-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics