New Network Management Scheme with Client’s Communication Control

  • Kazuya Odagiri
  • Rihito Yaegashi
  • Masaharu Tadauchi
  • Naohiro Ishii
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4252)


Where customers with different membership and position, use computers as in the university network systems, it often takes much time and efforts for them to cope with the change of the system management. This is because the requirements for the respective computer usage are different in the network and security policies. In this paper, a new destination addressing control system (DACS) scheme for the university network services is proposed. The DACS Scheme performs the network services efficiently through the communication management of a client. As the characteristic of DACS Scheme, only the setup modification is required by a system administrator, when the configuration change is needed in the network server. Then, the setup modification is unnecessary by a customer, which shows a merit for both a system administrator and a customer. This paper describes the instruction and the prototype for DACS Protocol as the implementation of DACS Scheme. Then, the simplicity of the system management in DACS Scheme, is examined from the customer and the system administrator viewpoints.


Network Service Security Policy Communication Control System Administrator Proxy Server 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Heilbronner, S., Wies, R.: Managing PC networks. IEEE Commun.Mag. 35(10), 112–117 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chauki, J., Shahsavari, M.: Component-based distributed network management. In: Proc. Southeast con 2000, pp. 460–466. IEEE Pub., Los Alamitos (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raman, L.: OSI systems and network management. IEEE Commun.Mag. 36(3), 46–53 (1998)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shimokawa, T., Koba, Y., Nakagawa, I., Yamamoto, B., Yoshida, N.: Server Selection Mechanism using DNS and Routing Information in Widely Distributed Environment. IEICE Tran. on Communications J86-B(8), 1454–1462 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Das, S.K., Harvey, D.J., Biswas, R.: Parallel processing of adaptive meshes with load balancing. IEEE Tran.on Parallel and Distributed Systems 12(12), 1269–1280 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soklic, M.E.: Simulation of load balancing algorithms: a comparative study. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34(4), 138–141 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aweya, J., Ouellette, M., Montuno, D.Y., Doray, B., Felske, K.: An adaptive load balancing scheme for web servers. Int. J. of Network Management 12(1), 3–39 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Konno, A., Yoshimura, T., Hashima, H., Iwatani, Y., Abe, T., Kinoshita, T.: Network Management Support System Based on the Activated Status Information. IPSJ Journal 46(2), 493–505 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kawashima, M., Matsushita, M.: Application of HTTP Protocol for Enterprise Network Management. IEICE Tran. on Communications J82-B (3), 339–346 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuya Odagiri
    • 1
  • Rihito Yaegashi
    • 2
  • Masaharu Tadauchi
    • 2
  • Naohiro Ishii
    • 1
  1. 1.Aichi Institute of TechnologyNagoya-cityJapan
  2. 2.Toyota Technological InstituteNagoya-cityJapan

Personalised recommendations