Skip to main content

Distributed Multi-contextual Ontology Evolution – A Step Towards Semantic Autonomy

  • Conference paper
Managing Knowledge in a World of Networks (EKAW 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4248))

Abstract

In today’s world there is a need for knowledge infrastructures that can support several autonomous knowledge bases all using different ontologies and constantly adapting these to their changing local needs. Moreover, these different knowledge bases are expressing their unique points of view and constitute different local contexts. At the same time interoperability is needed in order to connect these semantically dispersed knowledge bases, and we formalized this as a type of consistency. Both these aspects are included in our definition of semantic autonomy. We present a layered framework that shows how to design a scalable system having this property. In our approach both ontology and mapping evolution take place, at the same time as the whole system is kept coherent using lightweight methods for maintaining global consistency. However, in order to achieve this several restrictions are necessary and the logical language used by the individual ontologies is kept simple. Finally, we present some experimental results that demonstrate the scalability of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bonifacio, M., Cuel, R., Mameli, G., Nori, M.: A Peer-to-Peer Architecture for Distributed Knowledge Management. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Multi-Agent Systems, Large Complex Systems, and E-Businesses (MALCEB 2002) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zurawski, M.: Towards a context-sensitive distributed knowledge management system for the knowledge organization. In: Motta, E., Shadbolt, N.R., Stutt, A., Gibbins, N. (eds.) EKAW 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3257. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Froehner, T., Nickles, M., Weiß, G.: Towards modeling the social layer of emergent knowledge using open ontologies. In: ECAI Workshop on Agent-Mediated Knowledge Management (AMKM, Workshop Notes pp. 10–19) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robertson, D.: Multi-agent Coordination as Distributed Logic Programming. In: Demoen, B., Lifschitz, V. (eds.) ICLP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3132, pp. 416–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sure, Y.: A Framework for Handling Inconsistency in Changing Ontologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 353–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Zurawski, M.: Reasoning about multi-contextual ontology evolution. In: The First International Workshop on Context and Ontologies: Theories, Practice and Applications, The Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2005), July 9-13, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bouquet, P., Giunchiglia, F., van Harmelen, F., Serafini, L., Stuckenschmidt, H.: C-OWL: Contextualizing Ontologies. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K.P., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 164–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Heflin, J., Hendler, J.: Dynamic Ontologies on the Web, In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000). AAAI/MIT Press, Menlo Park (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Serafini, L., Tamilin, A.: DRAGO: Distributed Reasoning Architecture for the Semantic Web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 361–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghidini, C., Giunchiglia, F.: Local Model Semantics, or Contextual Reasoning = Locality + Compatibility. Artificial Intelligence 127(2), 221–259 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L., Studer, R., Volz, R.: Ontologies for Enterprise Knowledge Management. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18(2), 26–33 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stojanovic, L., Schneider, J., Maedche, A., Libischer, S., Studer, R., Lumpp, T., Abecker, A., Breiter, G., Dinger, J.: The role of ontologies in autonomic computing systems. IBM Systems Journal 43(3), 598–616 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Euzenat, J.: Corporate Memory through Cooperative Creation of Knowledge Base Systems and Hyper-Documents. In: Proc. of Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (KAW 1996), Banff, Canada (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zurawski, M. (2006). Distributed Multi-contextual Ontology Evolution – A Step Towards Semantic Autonomy. In: Staab, S., Svátek, V. (eds) Managing Knowledge in a World of Networks. EKAW 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11891451_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11891451_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46363-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46365-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics