Skip to main content

Personalized Search Results with User Interest Hierarchies Learnt from Bookmarks

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis (WebKDD 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4198))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Personalized web search incorporates an individual user’s interests when deciding relevant results to return. While, most web search engines are usually designed to serve all users, without considering the interests of individual users. We propose a method to (re)rank the results from a search engine using a learned user profile, called a user interest hierarchy (UIH), from web pages that are of interest to the user. The user’s interest in web pages will be determined implicitly, without directly asking the user. Experimental results indicate that our personalized ranking methods, when used with a popular search engine, can yield more potentially interesting web pages for individual users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, C.R.: A Machine Learning Approach to Web Personalization. Ph.D. thesis. University of Washington, Department of Computer Science and Engineering (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben Schafer, J., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Electronic commerce recommender applications. Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 5, 115–152 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bharat, K., Mihaila, G.A.: When experts agree: using non-affiliated experts to rank popular topics. In: Proc. of the 10th Intl. World Wide Web Conference (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brin, S., Motwani, R., Page, L., Winograd, T.: What can you do with a web in your pocket. In: Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cadez, I., Heckerman, D., Meek, C., Smyth, P., White, S.: Visualization of navigation pat-terns on web site using model based clustering. Technical Report MSR-TR-00-18, Microsoft Research, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, P.K.: A non-invasive learning approach to building web user profiles. In: KDD 1999 Workshop on Web Usage Analysis and User Profiling, 7–12 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, L., Sycara, K.: WebMate: A personal agent for browsing and searching. In: Proc. of the 2nd Intl. conf. on Autonomous Agents, pp. 132–139 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Croft, W.B., Das, R.: Experiments with query acquisition and use in document retrieval systems. In: Proc. of 13th ACM SIGIR (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Croft, W.B., Thompson, R.T.: I3R: A new approach to the design of document retrieval systems. Journal of the Americal Society for Information Science 38, 389–404 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Delaney, K.J.: Study questions whether google really is better. Wall Street Journal, May 25 (2004) B.1 http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?RQT=309&VInst=PROD&VName=PQD&VType=PQD&sid=5&index=45&SrchMode=1&Fmt=3&did=000000641646571&clientId=15106

  11. Eirinaki, M., Lampos, C., Paulakis, S., Vazirgiannis, M.: Web personalization integrating content semantics and navigational patterns. In: Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, pp. 72–79 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frakes, W.B., Baeza-Yates, R.: Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fu, X., Budzik, J., Hammond, K.J.: Mining navigation history for recommendation. In: Proc. 2000 Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Google co. (2004), http://www.google.com/

  15. Grossman, D., Frieder, O., Holmes, D., Roberts, D.: Integrating structured data and text: A relational approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48(2) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harper, D.J.: Relevance Feedback in Document Retrieval Systems: An Evaluation of Probabilistic Strategies. Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haveliwala, T.H.: Efficient computation of PageRank. Technical Report, Stanford University Database Group (1999), http://dbpubs.stanford.edu/pub/1999-31

  18. Haveliwala, T.H.: Topic-sensitive PageRank. In: Proc. of the 11th Intl. World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jeh, G., Widom, J.: Scaling personalized web search. In: Proc. of the 12th Intl. Conference on World Wide Web, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 20–24 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, D., Atluri, V., Bieber, M., Adam, N., Yesha, Y.: A clickstream-based collaborative filtering personalization model: towards a better performance. In: Workshop on Web Information and Data Management (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, H., Chan, P.K.: Implicit indicator for interesting web pages. In: International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 270–277 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, H., Chan, P.K.: Identifying variable-length meaningful phrases with correlation functions. In: IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 30–38. IEEE press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, H., Chan, P.K.: Learning implicit user interest hierarchy for context in personalization. In: International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 101–108 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, W.S., Vu, Q., Agrawal, D., Hara, Y., Takano, H.: PowerBookmarks: A System for personalizable web information organization, sharing, and management. In: Proc. of the 8th Intl. World Wide Web Conference, Toronto, Canada (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, F., Yu, C., Meng, W.: Personalized web search by mapping user queries to categories. In: CIKM 2002. ACM Press, Virginia (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maarek, Y.S., Ben-Shaul, I.Z.: Automatically organizing bookmarks per contents. In: Proc. 5th International World Wide Web Conference (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Mobasher, B., Cooley, R., Srivastava, J.: Creating adaptive web sites through usage-based clustering of URLs. In: Proc. 1999 IEEE Knowledge and Data Engineering Exchange Workshop, pp. 19–25 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical Report, Stanford University Database Group (1998), http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/368196.html

  30. Pazzani, M., Billsus, D.: Learning and revising user profiles: The identification of interesting web sites. Machine Learning 27(3), 313–331 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Salton, G., Waldstein, R.G.: Term relevance weights in online information retrieval. Information Processing and Management 14, 29–35 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shahabi, C., Banaei-Kashani, F.: Efficient and anonymous web-usage mining for web personalization. INFORMS Journal on Computing-Special Issue on Data Mining 15(2) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stefani, A., Strapparava, C.: Exploiting nlp techniques to build user model for web sites: The use of worldnet in SiteIF project. In: Proc. 2nd Workshop on Adaptive Systems and User Modeling on the WWW (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Teevan, J., Dumais, S.T., Horvitz, E.: Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities. In: Proc. SIGIR (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval, pp. 68–176. Butterworths, London (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vivisimo co. (2004), http://www.vivisimo.com

  37. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval. Information Processing & Management 22(6), 465–476 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wexelblat, A., Maes, P.: Footprints: History-rich web browsing. In: Proc. Conference on Computer-Assisted Information Retrieval (RIAO), pp. 75–84 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yan, T.W., Jacobsen, M., Garcia-Molina, H., Dayal, U.: From user access patterns to dynamic hypertext linking. In: Proc. 5th International World Wide Web Conference (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zukerman, I., Albrecht, D.W., Nicholson, A.E.: Predicting users’ requests on the WWW. In: Proc. of the 7th Intel. Conference on User Modeling (UM), Banff, Canada, pp. 275–284 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, Hr., Chan, P.K. (2006). Personalized Search Results with User Interest Hierarchies Learnt from Bookmarks. In: Nasraoui, O., Zaïane, O., Spiliopoulou, M., Mobasher, B., Masand, B., Yu, P.S. (eds) Advances in Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis. WebKDD 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4198. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11891321_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11891321_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46346-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46348-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics