Skip to main content

An Effective Robotic Model of Action Selection

  • Conference paper
Current Topics in Artificial Intelligence (CAEPIA 2005)

Abstract

In this paper we present a concise analysis of the requirements for effective action selection, and a centralized action selection model that fulfills most of these requirements. In this model, action selection occurs by combining sensory information from the non-homogenous sensors of an off-the-shelf robot with the feedback from competing behavioral modules. In order to successfully clean an arena, the animal robot (animat) has to present a coherent overall behavior pattern for both appropriate selection and termination of a selected behavior type. In the same way, an animat set in a chasing task has to present opportunist action selection to locate the nearest target. In consequence, both an appropriate switching of behavior patterns and a coherent overall behavior pattern are necessary for effective action selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tyrrell, T.: Computational Mechanisms for action selection, in Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Montes Gonzalez, F., Marin Hernandez, A.: Central Action Selection using Sensor Fusion. In: The 5th Mexican International Conference on Computer Science (ENC 2004), IEEE Computer Society, Colima, México (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Montes Gonzalez, F., Marin Hernandez, A.: The Use of Frontal and Peripheral Perception in a Prey-Catching System. In: The 4th International Symposium on Robotics and Automation (ISRA 2004), Querétaro, México (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Montes Gonzalez, F., Flandes Eusebio, D.: The Development of a Basic Follow-Behavior within a Distributed Framework. In: The 1st IEEE Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS 2004). México, D.F., México (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prescott, T.J., Redgrave, P., Gurney, K.N.: Layered control architectures in robots and vertebrates. Adaptive Behavior 7(1), 99–127 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Snaith, S., Holland, O.: An investigation of two mediation strategies suitable for behavioural control in animals and animats. In: From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the First International Conference Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour, Paris (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Werner, M.G.: Using Second Order Neural Connections for Motivation of Behavioral Choices. In: Cliff, D. (ed.) From Animals to Animats 3: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Redgrave, P., Prescott, T., Gurney, K.N.: The basal ganglia: A vertebrate solution to the selection problem? Neuroscience 89, 1009–1023 (1999b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ludlow, A.R.: The behaviour of a model animal. Behaviour 58, 131–172 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brooks, R.A.: A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, RA-2, 14–23 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenblatt, K.J., Payton, D.W.: A Fine-Grained Alternative to the Subsumption architecture for Mobile Robot Control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/INNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McFarland, D.J.: Flow graph representation of motivational systems. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 18(1), 25–43 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McFarland, D.J.: Feedback Mechanisms in Animal Behaviour. Academic Press, London (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenblatt, J.K., Thorpe, C.E.: Combining multiple goals in a behavior-based architecture. In: Proceedings of 1995 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Humphrys, S.: Action selection methods using reinforcement learning. In: From Animals to Animats 4: Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Montes Gonzalez, F., Prescott, T.J., Gurney, K., et al.: An embodied model of action selection mechanisms in the vertebrate brain. In: Meyer, J.A. (ed.) From Animals to Animats 6: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prescott, T.J., Montes Gonzalez, F.M., Gurney, K., et al.: A robot model of the basal ganglia: behavior and intrinsic processing. Neural Networks (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

González, F.M.M., Hernández, A.M., Figueroa, H.R. (2006). An Effective Robotic Model of Action Selection. In: Marín, R., Onaindía, E., Bugarín, A., Santos, J. (eds) Current Topics in Artificial Intelligence. CAEPIA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11881216_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11881216_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45914-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45915-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics