Abstract
In this paper, some recent ideas will be presented about making machine learning (ML) more effective through mechanisms of argumentation. In this sense, argument-based machine learning (ABML) is defined as a refinement of the usual definition of ML. In ABML, some learning examples are accompanied by arguments, that are expert’s reasons for believing why these examples are as they are. Thus ABML provides a natural way of introducing domain-specific prior knowledge in a way that is different from the traditional, general background knowledge. The task of ABML is to find a theory that explains the “argumented” examples by making reference to the given reasons. ABML, so defined, is motivated by the following advantages in comparison with standard learning from examples: (1) arguments impose constraints over the space of possible hypotheses, thus reducing search complexity, and (2) induced theories should make more sense to the expert. Ways of realising ABML by extending some existing ML techniques are discussed, and the aforementioned advantages of ABML are demonstrated experimentally.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bratko, I.: Prolog Programming for Artificial Intelligence, 3rd edn. Pearson Education / Addison-Wesley (2001)
Bratko, I., Možina, M.: Argumentation and machine learning. Chapter 5 of Theoretical framework for argumentation, ASPIC project, deliverable D2.1 (2004)
Clark, P., Niblett, T.: The CN2 induction algorithm. MachineLearning Journal 4, 261–283 (1989)
Gomez, S.A., Chesnevar, C.I.: Integrating defeasible argumentation and machine learning techniques. Technical report, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahia Blanca (2004)
Možina, M., Demšar, J., Žabkar, J., Bratko, I.: Why is rule learning optimistic and how to correct it. In: Fürnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4212, pp. 330–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Možina, M., Žabkar, J., Bench-Capon, T., Bratko, I.: Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law (in press, 2006)
Možina, M., Žabkar, J., Bratko, I.: Argument based rule learning. In: ECAI 2006, Riva del Garda, Italy, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Možina, M., Žabkar, J., Videčnik, J., Bratko, I.: Argument based machine learning in a medical domain. In: Proc. COMMA 2006, Manchester (2006)
Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Handbook of Philosophical Logic. In: Logics for Defeasible Argumentation, 2nd edn., vol. 4, pp. 218–319. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bratko, I., Možina, M., Žabkar, J. (2006). Argument-Based Machine Learning. In: Esposito, F., Raś, Z.W., Malerba, D., Semeraro, G. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11875604_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11875604_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45764-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45766-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)