Skip to main content

An Evaluation Measure of Image Segmentation Based on Object Centres

  • Conference paper
Image Analysis and Recognition (ICIAR 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4141))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Classification of organic materials obtained from rock and drill cuttings involves finding multiple objects in the image. This task is usually approached by segmentation. The quality of segmentation is evaluated by matching the whole detected objects to a reference segmentation. We are interested in representing each object by a single reference point called the “centre”. This paper proposes an evaluation measure of image segmentation for such representation. We argue that measures based only on distance between obtained centres and a set of predefined centres are insufficient. The proposed measure is based on a list of desirable properties of the segmentation. The three components of the measure evaluate the under/over segmentation of the objects, the proportion of centres placed in the background rather than in objects, and the distance between the guessed and the true centres. The ability of the measure to distinguish between segmentation results of different quality is illustrated on three sets of examples including an image containing microfossils and pieces of inert material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.J.: A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation. Pattern Recognition 29(8), 1335–1346 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beauchemin, M., Thomson, K.P.B.: The evaluation of segmentation results and the overlapping area matrix. Remote Sensing 18(18), 3895–3899 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardoso, J.S., Corte-Real, L.: Toward a generic evaluation of image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14(10), 1773–1782 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoover, A., Jean-Baptiste, G., Jiang, X., Flynn, P., Bunke, H., Goldgof, D., Bower, K., Eggert, D., Filtzbiggbon, A., Fisher, R.: An eperimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 18, 673–689 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borsotti, M., Campadelli, P., Schettini, R.: Quantitative evaluation of color image segmentation results. Pattern Recognition Letters 19, 741–747 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, J., Yang, Y.H.: Multiresolution color image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 16(7), 689–700 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 846–850 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elisseeff, A.B.H.A., Guyon, I.: A stability based method for discovering structure in clustered data. In: Proc. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 6–17 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hubert, L., Arabie, P.: Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification 2, 193–218 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bollmann, J., Quinn, P.S., Vela, M., Brabec, B., Brechner, S., Cortes, M.Y., Hilbrecht, H., Schmidt, D.N., Schiebel, R., Thierstein, H.R.: Automated particle analysis: Calcareous microfossils. Image Analysis, Sediments and Paleoenvironments 7, 229–252 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Charles, J.J., Kuncheva, L.I., Wells, B., Lim, I.S.: Object location within microscopic images of palynofacies (submitted, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borgefors, G.: Distance transformations in digital images. Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing 34(3), 344–371 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Y., Chou, J.: Automatic segmentation of touching rice kernels with an active contour model. Transactions of the ASAE 47(5), 1803–1811 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paul, G.V., Beach, G.J., Cohen, C.J.: A realtime object tracking system using a color camera. In: Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop, pp. 137–142 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vincent, L., Soille, P.: Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13(6), 583–598 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Charles, J.J., Kuncheva, L.I., Wells, B., Lim, I.S. (2006). An Evaluation Measure of Image Segmentation Based on Object Centres. In: Campilho, A., Kamel, M.S. (eds) Image Analysis and Recognition. ICIAR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4141. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11867586_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11867586_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44891-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44893-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics