Segmenting Lung Fields in Serial Chest Radiographs Using Both Population and Patient-Specific Shape Statistics

  • Yonghong Shi
  • Feihu Qi
  • Zhong Xue
  • Kyoko Ito
  • Hidenori Matsuo
  • Dinggang Shen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4190)


This paper presents a new deformable model using both population-based and patient-specific shape statistics to segment lung fields from serial chest radiographs. First, a modified scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) local descriptor is used to characterize the image features in the vicinity of each pixel, so that the deformable model deforms in a way that seeks for the region with similar SIFT local descriptors. Second, the deformable model is constrained by both population-based and patient-specified shape statistics. Initially, population-based shape statistics takes most of the rules when the number of serial images is small; gradually, patient-specific shape statistics takes more rules after a sufficient number of segmentation results on the same patient have been obtained. The proposed deformable model can adapt to the shape variability of different patients, and obtain more robust and accurate segmentation results.


  1. 1.
    van Ginneken, B., ter Haar Romeny, B.M., Viergever, M.A.: Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: a survey. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging 20(12), 1228–1241 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Ginneken, B., Stegmann, M.B., Loog, M.: Segmentation of anatomical structures in chest radiographs using supervised methods: a comparative study on a public database. Medical Image Analysis 10, 19–40 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, M.S., Wilson, L.S., Doust, B.D., Gill, R.W., Sun, C.: Knowledge-based method for segmentation and analysis of lung boundaries in chest X-ray images. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 22, 463–477 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jaeger, J.W., Mehta, R.L.: Assessment of dry weight in hemodialysis: an overview. Journal of American Social Nephrology 10, 392–403 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., Cooper, D., Graham, J.: Active shape models - their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61(1), 38–59 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J.: Statistical models of appearance for computer vision. Technical Report, Wolfson Image Analysis Unit, University of Manchester (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lowe, D.G.: Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: International Conference on Computer Vision (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mikolajczyk, K., Schmid, C.: A performance evaluation of local descriptors. In: IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jenkinson, M., Smith, S.: A global optimization method for robust affine registration of brain images. Medical Image Analysis 5, 143–156 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nyul, L.G., Udupa, J.K., Zhang, X.: New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 19(2), 143–150 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shiraishi, J., Katsuragawa, S., Ikezoe, J., Matsumoto, T., Kobayashi, T., Komatsu, K., Matsui, M., Fujita, H., Kodera, Y., Doi, K.: Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operation characteristic analysis of radiologists detection of pulmonary nodules. American Journal of Roentgenology 174, 71–74 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davatzikos, C., Tao, X., Shen, D.: Hierarchical active shape models using the wavelet transform. IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging 22(3), 414–423 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes: active contour models. Internal Journal of Computer Vision 1(4), 321–331 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Browne, R.F.J., O’Reilly, G., Mclnerney, D.: Extraction of the two-dimensional cardiothoracic ratio from digital PA chest radiographs: correlation with cardiac function and the traditional cardiothoracic ratio. Journal of Digital Imaging 17(2), 120–123 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G.: Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346(8982), 1085–1087 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yonghong Shi
    • 1
  • Feihu Qi
    • 1
  • Zhong Xue
    • 2
  • Kyoko Ito
    • 3
  • Hidenori Matsuo
    • 3
  • Dinggang Shen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Section of Biomedical Image Analysis, Department of RadiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Hidaka HospitalTakasaki Gunma-PrefectureJapan

Personalised recommendations