Abstract
Managing emails from list-servs is an open problem that we believe may be partially resolved by the introduction of a principled, argumentation-based approach towards their representation. We propose an argumentation ontology, called “Argontonaut,” which has been developed for the domain of standards-driven W3C mailing lists. We use the extensible nature of RDF to fuse an argumentation-based approach with one grounded in an issue-management system. We motivate our ontology with reference to the domain and propose future work in this area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, J., Core, M.: Draft of DAMSL, Dialogue Annotation Mark-up in Several Layers (1997), http://www.cs.rochester.edu/research/speech/damsl/RevisedManual/
Buckingham Shum, S.: The Roots of Computer Supported Argument Visualization. In: Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S., Carr, C. (eds.) Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer, London (2003)
Levinson, S.: Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Mann, W., Thompson, S.: Rhetorical Structure Theory. Text, vol. 8 (1988)
Mc Guinness, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Oveview. W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
de Moorl, A., Efimova, L.: An Argumentation Analysis of Weblog Conversations. In: Proceedings of the 9th Int’l. Conference on Perspective on Communication Modelling (2004)
O’Keefe, D.: Two Concepts of Argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association 13 (1977)
Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A. (eds.): SPARQL Query Language. W3C Candidate Recommendation (2006), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
Manola, F., Miller, E. (eds.): RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
Tempich, C., Pinto, H.S., Sure, Y., Staab, S.: An Argumentation Ontology for DIstributed, Loosely-controlled and evolvInG Engineering processes of oNTologies (DILIGENT). In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 241–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)
Vlkel, M., Krtzsch, M., Vrandecic, D., Haller, H., Studer, R.: Semantic Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 15th Int’l. Conference on World Wide Web (WWW) (2006)
Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany (1995)
Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Pearson Education, NJ (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fraser, C., Halpin, H., Thomas, K.E. (2006). Developing an Argumentation Ontology for Mailing Lists. In: Euzenat, J., Domingue, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. AIMSA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4183. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11861461_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11861461_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40930-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40931-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)