Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Approach to Reasoning with Trust, Distrust and Insufficient Trust

  • Conference paper
Book cover Cooperative Information Agents X (CIA 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4149))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Multi-agent systems are based upon cooperative interactions between agents, in which agents provide information, resources and services to others. Typically agents are autonomous and self-interested, meaning that they have control over their own actions, and that they seek to maximise their own goal achievement, rather than necessarily acting in a benevolent or socially-oriented manner. Consequently, interaction outcomes are uncertain since commitments can be broken and the actual services rendered may differ from expectations in terms of cost or quality. Cooperation is, therefore, an uncertain interaction, that has an inherent risk of failure or reduced performance. In this paper we show how agents can use trust to manage this risk. Our approach uses fuzzy logic to represent trust and allow agents to reason with uncertain and imprecise information regarding others’ trustworthiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Principles of trust for MAS: Cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), Paris, France, pp. 72–79 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gambetta, D.: Can we trust trust? In: Gambetta, D. (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, pp. 213–237. Basil Blackwell, Malden (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Griffiths, N.: Trust: Challenges and opportunities. AgentLink News 19, 9–11 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Griffiths, N.: Fuzzy trust for peer-to-peer systems. In: Proceedings of the P2P Data and Knowledge Sharing Workshop (P2P/DAKS 2006) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths, N., Chao, K.-M.: Experience-based trust: Enabling effective resource selection in a grid environment. In: Herrmann, P., Issarny, V., Shiu, S.C.K. (eds.) iTrust 2005. LNCS, vol. 3477, pp. 240–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Luhmann, N.: Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In: Gambetta, D. (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, pp. 94–107. Basil Blackwell, Malden (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mamdani, E.H., Assilian, S.: An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 7(1), 1–13 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Manchala, D.W.: E-commerce trust metrics and models. IEEE Internet Computing 4(2), 36–44 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsh, S., Dibben, M.R.: Trust, untrust, distrust and mistrust — an exploration of the dark(er) side. In: Herrmann, P., Issarny, V., Shiu, S.C.K. (eds.) iTrust 2005. LNCS, vol. 3477, pp. 17–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. NRC Institute for Information Technology. The FuzzyJ toolkit (2006), www.iit.nrc.ca/IR_public/fuzzy/fuzzyJToolkit2.html

  11. Ramchurn, S.D., Sierra, C., Godo, L., Jennings, N.R.: Devising a trust model for multi-agent interactions using confidence and reputation. Artificial Intelligence 18(9–10), 833–852 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ross, T.J.: Fuzzy Logic With Engineering Applications, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: REGRET: A reputation model for gregarious societies. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents in Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 475–482 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Song, S., Hwang, K., Zhou, R., Kwok, Y.-K.: Trusted P2P transactions with fuzzy reputation aggregation. IEEE Internet Computing 9(6), 24–34 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stakhanova, N., Basu, S., Wong, J., Stakhanov, O.: Trust framework for P2P networks using peer-profile based anomaly technique. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Security in Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 203–209 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xiong, L., Liu, L.: PeerTrust: Supporting reputation-based trust in peer-to-peer communities. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(7), 843–857 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh, L.A.: A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. Journal of Cybernetics 2(3), 4–34 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Griffiths, N. (2006). A Fuzzy Approach to Reasoning with Trust, Distrust and Insufficient Trust. In: Klusch, M., Rovatsos, M., Payne, T.R. (eds) Cooperative Information Agents X. CIA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11839354_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11839354_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38569-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38570-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics