Skip to main content

Eliminating Interdependencies Between Issues for Multi-issue Negotiation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4149))

Abstract

In multi-issue negotiations, issues may be negotiated independently or not. In the latter case, the utility associated with one issue depends on the value of another. These issue dependencies give rise to more complex, non-linear utility spaces. As a consequence, the computational cost and complexity of negotiating interdependent issues is increased significantly compared to the case of independent issues. Several techniques have been proposed to deal with this increased complexity, including, for example, introducing a mediator in the negotiation setting. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach based on a weighted approximation technique to simplify the utility space. We show that given certain natural assumptions about the outcome of negotiation the application of this technique results in an outcome that closely matches with the outcome based on the original, interdependent utility structure. Moreover, using the approximated utility structure, each of the issues can be negotiated independently which ensures that the negotiation is computationally tractable. The approach is illustrated by applying and testing it in a case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bar-Yam, Y.: Dynamics of complex systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbuceanu, M., Lo, W.K.: Multi-attribute Utility Theoretic Negotiation for Electronic Commerce. In: Dignum, F.P.M., Cortés, U. (eds.) AMEC 2000. LNCS, vol. 2003, pp. 15–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Binmore, K.: Fun and Games: A Text on Game Theory. DC Heath and Company, Lexington (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: An Agent Architecture for Multi-Attribute Negotiation. In: Nebel, B. (ed.) Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on AI, IJCAI 2001, pp. 1195–1201 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klein, M., Faratin, P., Sayama, H., Bar-Yam, Y.: Negotiating Complex Contracts. In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. AAAI Press, Bologna (2002); Paper 125 of the Center for eBusines@MIT, http://ebusiness.mit.edu

  6. Lai, G., Li, C., Sycara, K., Giampapa, J.: Literature Review on Multi-attribute Negotiations. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-04-66, Cornegie Mellon University, Robotics Institute (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pruitt, D.G.: Negotiation Behavior. Academic Press, London (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., Metcalfe, D.: Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robu, V., Somefun, D.J.A., La Poutre, J.A.: Complex Multi-Issue Negotiations Using Utility Graphs. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 280–287 (July 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation Among Computers. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sierra, C., Faratin, P., Jennings, N.R.: A service-oriented negotiation model between autonomous agents. In: Boman, M., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1997. LNCS, vol. 1237, pp. 17–35. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson, L.: The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, I.-J., Chong, E.K.P., Kulkarni, S.R.: Weighted Averaging and Stochastic Approximation. In: Proceeding of the 35th Conference on Decision and Control, Kobe, Japan, pp. 1071–1076 (December 1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M., Tykhonov, D. (2006). Eliminating Interdependencies Between Issues for Multi-issue Negotiation. In: Klusch, M., Rovatsos, M., Payne, T.R. (eds) Cooperative Information Agents X. CIA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11839354_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11839354_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38569-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38570-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics