Skip to main content

Worst-Case Vs. Algorithmic Average-Case Complexity in the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy

  • Conference paper
Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX 2006, RANDOM 2006)

Abstract

We show that for every integer k>1, if Σ k , the k’th level of the polynomial-time hierarchy, is worst-case hard for probabilistic polynomial-time algorithms, then there is a language L ∈Σ k such that for every probabilistic polynomial-time algorithm that attempts to decide it, there is a samplable distribution over the instances of L, on which the algorithm errs with probability at least 1/2–1/poly(n) (where the probability is over the choice of instances and the randomness of the algorithm). In other words, on this distribution the algorithm essentially does not perform any better than the algorithm that simply decides according to the outcome of an unbiased coin toss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ben-David, S., Chor, B., Goldreich, O., Luby, M.: On the theory of average case complexity. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 379–386 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Babai, L., Fortnow, L., Nisan, N., Wigderson, A.: BPP has subexponential simulation unless Exptime has publishable proofs. Computational Complexity 3, 307–318 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogdanov, A., Trevisan, L.: On worst-case to average-case reductions for NP problems. In: Proceedings of the 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 308–317 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feigenbaum, J., Fortnow, L.: Random-self-reducibility of complete sets. SIAM Journal on Computing 22, 994–1005 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldreich, O., Levin, L.A.: A hard-core predicate for all one-way functions. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 25–32 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gutfreund, D., Shaltiel, R., Ta-Shma, A.: if NP languages are hard in the worst-case then it is easy to find their hard instances. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 243–257 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gutfreund, D., Ta-Shma, A.: New connections between derandomization, worst-case complexity and average-case complexity (submitted for publication, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Impagliazzo, R.: A personal view of average-case complexity. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Structure in Complexity Theory, pp. 134–147 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Impagliazzo, R., Wigderson, A.: P = BPP if E requires exponential circuits: Derandomizing the XOR lemma. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 220–229 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kabanets, V.: Easiness assumptions and hardness tests: Trading time for zero error. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 63(2), 236–252 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Levin, L.: Average case complete problems. SIAM Journal on Computing 15(1), 285–286 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lipton, R.: New directions in testing. In: Proceedings of DIMACS workshop on distributed computing and cryptography, vol. 2, pp. 191–202 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mulmuley, K., Vazirani, U.V., Vazirani, V.V.: Matching is as easy as matrix inversion. Combinatorica 7(1), 105–113 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sudan, M., Trevisan, L., Vadhan, S.: Pseudorandom generators without the XOR Lemma. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 537–546 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Trevisan, L., Vadhan, S.: Pseudorandomness and average-case complexity via uniform reductions. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 129–138 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Viola, E.: Hardness vs. randomness within alternating time. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 53–62 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Valiant, L.G., Vazirani, V.V.: NP is as easy as detecting unique solutions. Theoretical Computer Science 47(1), 85–93 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Yao, A.C.: Theory and applications of trapdoor functions. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 80–91 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gutfreund, D. (2006). Worst-Case Vs. Algorithmic Average-Case Complexity in the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy. In: Díaz, J., Jansen, K., Rolim, J.D.P., Zwick, U. (eds) Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques. APPROX RANDOM 2006 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4110. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11830924_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11830924_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38044-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38045-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics