Abstract
Capability assessment can play an important role in the digital government domain in at least two ways: one is to provide a basis for judging whether agencies are ready to initiate some digital government innovation, and the other is to judge the impact of a digital government initiative in terms of improved capabilities. The problems of how to assess and enhance organizational capability are therefore central to virtually all efforts to improve government performance, particularly in the area of information technology innovation. This paper describes the approach used in developing a set of toolkits for use in assessing capability, with examples from versions developed for use in justice information integration projects and state-level digital preservation planning in the US. The paper includes the theoretical rationale for the design of the toolkits, methods for their use, and implications for use in practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Segars, A.H., Grover, V.: Profiles of Strategic Information Systems Planning. Information Systems Research 10, 199–232 (1999)
U.S.Government Accountability Office, Information Technology Investment Management: A Framework for Assessing and Improving Process Maturity. GAO, Washington (2004)
Williamson, O.E.: Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 20, 1087–1108 (1999)
Cresswell, A.M., Pardo, T.A., Canestraro, D.S., Dawes, S.S., Juraga, D.: Sharing Justice Information: A Capability Assessment Toolkit, Center for Technology in Government, Albany, NY (November 2005)
Pardo, T.A., Cresswell, A.M., Dawes, S.S., Burke, B., Dadayan, L., Embar, S., Kwon, H.: Building State Government Digital Preservation Partnerships: A Capability Assessment and Planning Toolkit, Center for Technology in Government, Albany, NY (August 2005)
Lyytinen, K., Robey, D.: Learning failure in information systems development. Information Systems Journal 9, 85–102 (1999)
Goldstein, H.: Who Killed the Virtual Case File? IEEE Spectrum 42 (2005)
Orlikowski, W.J.: Using Technology and Constituting Structure: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 11, 404–428 (2000)
Lyytinen, K.: Empirical Research in Information Systems: On the Relevance of Practice in Thinking of IS Research. MIS Quarterly 23, 25–27 (1999)
Luna-Reyes, L.F., Zhang, J., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Cresswell, A.M.: Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: A practice approach. European Journal of Information Systems 14, 93–105 (2005)
Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K., Lyytinen, K.: Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge University Press, New York (1995)
Boudreau, M.C., Robey, D.: Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective. Organization Science 16, 3–18 (2005)
Richardson, G.B.: The Organization of Industry. Economic Journal 82, 883–896 (1972)
Penrose, E.T.: The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press, New York (1959)
Helfat, C.E., Raubitschek, R.S.: Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge capabilities and products. Strategic Management Journal 21, 961–979 (2000)
Kogut, B., Zander, U.: What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science 7, 502–518 (1996)
VandeVen, A.H., Poole, M.S.: Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota innovation research program. Organization Science 1, 313–385 (1990)
Pardo, T.A., Cresswell, A.M., Dawes, S.S., Burke, G.B.: Modeling the Social & Technical Processes of Interorganizational Information Integration. Presented at Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences Hawaii (2004)
Barki, H., Rivard, S., Talbot, J.: An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management. Journal of Management Information Systems 17, 37–69 (2001)
Paulk, M.C., Weber, C.V., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B.: The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison Wesley, Reading (1994)
Averill, E.: Reference Models and Standards. StandardView Archive 2, 96–109 (1994)
Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)
Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, New York City (1999)
Thompson, M.: Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice. Organization Science 16, 151–164 (2005)
Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984)
Levina, N., Vaast, E.: Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 29, 335–363 (2005)
Bourdieu, P.: The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1980) (translated 1990)
Rose, J., Jones, M.: The Double Dance of Agency: A Socio-Theoretic Account of How Machines and Humans Interact. Systems, Signs & Actions 1, 1937 (2005)
Shapiro, S.P.: Agency Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 31, 26384 (2005)
Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21, 1105–1121 (2000)
Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., Rajiv, S.: Conceptualizing and Measuring Capabilities: Methodology and Empirical Application. Strategic Management Journal 26, 277–285 (2005)
Cockburn, I.M., Henderson, R.M., Stern, S.: Untangling the origins of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 21, 1123–1145 (2000)
Raff, D.M.G.: Superstores and the evolution of firm capabilities in American bookselling. Strategic Management Journal 21, 1043–1059 (2000)
Rosenbloom, R.S.: Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change: The Transformation of NCR in the Electronic Era. Strategic Management Journal 21, 1083–1103 (2000)
Sosa, M.E., Eppinger, S.D., Rowles, C.M.: The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development. Management Science 30, 1674–1689 (2004)
Provan, K.G., Milward, B.H.: A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 1–34 (1995)
Heclo, H.: A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington. Brookings Institution, Washington (1977)
Zhang, J.: Expectations and perceptions of benefits and barriers in public sector knowledge networks. Public Performance & Management Review (forthcoming)
Rethemeyer, R.K.: Conceptualizing and Measuring Collaborative Networks. Public Administration Review 65, 117–121 (2005)
Pouloudi, A., Whitley, E.A.: Stakeholder Identification in Inter- Organizational Systems: Gaining Insights for Drug Use Management Systems. European Journal of Information Systems 6, 1–14 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cresswell, A.M., Pardo, T.A., Canestraro, D.S. (2006). Digital Capability Assessment for eGovernment: A Multi-dimensional Approach. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Grönlund, Å., Andersen, K.V. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4084. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37686-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37687-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)