Skip to main content

Very Sparse Leaf Languages

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2006 (MFCS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4162))

Abstract

Unger studied the balanced leaf languages defined via poly-logarithmically sparse leaf pattern sets. Unger shows that NP-complete sets are not polynomial-time many-one reducible to such balanced leaf language unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to Θ\(^{p}_{\rm 2}\) and that Σ\(^{p}_{\rm 2}\)-complete sets are not polynomial-time bounded-truth-table reducible (respectively), polynomial-time Turing reducible) to any such balanced leaf language unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to Δ\(^{p}_{\rm 2}\) (respectively, Σ\(^{p}_{\rm 4}\)).

This paper studies the complexity of the class of such balanced leaf languages, which will be denoted by VSLL. In particular, the following tight upper and lower bounds of VSLL are shown:

1. coNP ⊆ VSLL ⊆ coNP/poly (the former inclusion is already shown by Unger).

2. coNP/1 \(\not\subseteq\) VSLL unless PH = Θ\(^{p}_{\rm 2}\).

3. For all constant c>0, VSLL \(\not\subseteq\) coNP/n c.

4. P/(loglog(n) + O(1)) ⊆ VSLL.

5. For all h(n) = loglog(n) + ω(1), P\(/h \not\subseteq\) VSLL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrington, D.: Bounded-width polynomial-size branching programs recognize exactly those languages in NC1. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 38, 150–164 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bovet, D., Crescenzi, P., Silvestri, R.: A uniform approach to define complexity classes. Theoretical Computer Science 104(2), 263–283 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai, J.: S2 p ⊆ ZPPNP. In: Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 620–629. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cai, J., Chakaravarthy, V., Hemaspaandra, L., Ogihara, M.: Competing provers yield improved Karp–Lipton collapse results. In: Alt, H., Habib, M. (eds.) STACS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2607, pp. 535–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cai, J., Furst, M.: PSPACE survives constant-width bottlenecks. International Journal on Foundations of Computer Science 2(1), 67–76 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Canetti, R.: More on BPP and the polynomial-time hierarchy. Information Processing Letters 57(5), 237–241 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fortnow, L., Ogihara, M.: Very sparse leaf languages. Technical Report 899. Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldschlager, L., Parberry, I.: On the construction of parallel computers from various bases of boolean functions. Theoretical Computer Science 43, 43–58 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldreich, O., Micali, S., Wigderson, A.: Proofs that yield nothing but their validity or all languages in NP have zero-knowledge proof systems. Journal of the ACM 38(3), 690–728 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadin, J.: PNP[logn] and sparse Turing-complete sets for NP. SIAM Journal on Computing 17(6), 1263–1282 (1988); Erratum 20(2), 404 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karp, R., Lipton, R.: Some connections between nonuniform and uniform complexity classes. In: Proceedings of the 12th Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 302–309. ACM Press, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, M., Vitányi, P.: An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its application. Springer, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ogiwara, M., Watanabe, O.: On polynomial time bounded truth-table reducibility of NP sets to sparse sets. SIAM Journal of Computing 20(3), 471–483 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, A., Sundaram, R.: Symmetric alternation captures BPP. Computational Complexity 7(2), 152–162 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Unger, F.: On small hard leaf languages. In: Jedrzejowicz, J., Szepietowski, A. (eds.) MFCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3618, pp. 781–792. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Yap, C.-K.: Consequences of non-uniform conditions on uniform classes. Theoretical Computer Science 26, 287–300 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fortnow, L., Ogihara, M. (2006). Very Sparse Leaf Languages. In: Královič, R., Urzyczyn, P. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2006. MFCS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4162. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11821069_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11821069_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37791-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37793-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics