Skip to main content

Liveness, Fairness and Impossible Futures

  • Conference paper
CONCUR 2006 – Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4137))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Impossible futures equivalence is the semantic equivalence on labelled transition systems that identifies systems iff they have the same “AGEF” properties: temporal logic properties saying that reaching a desired outcome is not doomed to fail. We show that this equivalence, with an added root condition, is the coarsest congruence containing weak bisimilarity with explicit divergence that respects deadlock/livelock traces (or fair testing, or any liveness property under a global fairness assumption) and assigns unique solutions to recursive equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aceto, L.(moderator): Some open problems in Process Algebra (2003), http://www.cs.auc.dk/luca/BICI/open-problems.html

  2. Baeten, J.C.M. (ed.): Applications of Process Algebra. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 17. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baeten, J.C.M., Bergstra, J.A., Klop, J.W.: On the consistency of Koomen’s fair abstraction rule. Theoretical Computer Science 51(l/2), 129–176 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom, B., Istrael, S., Meyer, A.: Bisimulation Can’t Be Traced. Journal of the ACM 42(1), 232–268 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brinksma, E., Rensink, A., Vogler, W.: Fair Testing. In: Lee, I., Smolka, S.A. (eds.) CONCUR 1995. LNCS, vol. 962, pp. 311–327. Springer, Heidelberg (1995); Journal preprint: http://eprints.eemcs.utwente.nl/1623/01/submitted.pdf

  6. Brookes, S.D., Hoare, C.A.R., Roscoe, A.W.: A theory of communicating sequential processes. Journal of the ACM 31(3), 560–599 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching-time temporal logic. In: Kozen, D. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1981. LNCS, vol. 131, pp. 52–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. De Nicola, R., Vaandrager, F.W.: Three logics for branching bisimulation. Journal of the ACM 42(2), 458–487 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Francez, N.: Fairness. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. van Glabbeek, R.J.: The Linear Time – Branching Time Spectrum II: The semantics of sequential systems with silent moves (extended abstract). In: Best, E. (ed.) CONCUR 1993. LNCS, vol. 715, pp. 66–81. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Glabbeek, R.J.: A Characterisation of Weak Bisimulation Congruence. In: Middeldorp, A., van Oostrom, V., van Raamsdonk, F., de Vrijer, R. (eds.) Processes, Terms and Cycles: Steps on the Road to Infinity: Essays Dedicated to J.W. Klop, On the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, LNCS, vol. 3838, pp. 26–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs (1990); In: Milner, R.(ed.) A Calculus of Communication Systems. LNCS, vol. 92. Springer, Heidelberg (1980) (earlier version appeared)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vogler, W.: Modular Construction and Partial Order Semantics of Petri Nets. LNCS, vol. 625. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Voorhoeve, M., Mauw, S.: Impossible Futures and Determinism. Information Processing Letters 80(1), 51–58 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Glabbeek, R., Voorhoeve, M. (2006). Liveness, Fairness and Impossible Futures. In: Baier, C., Hermanns, H. (eds) CONCUR 2006 – Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11817949_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11817949_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37376-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37377-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics