Skip to main content

Operational Determinism and Fast Algorithms

  • Conference paper
Book cover CONCUR 2006 – Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4137))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The main contribution of this work is a fast algorithm for checking whether a labelled transition system (LTS) is operationally deterministic. Operational determinism is a condition on the LTS designed to capture the notion of “deterministic behaviour” without ruling out invisible actions and divergence, and without strictly devoting oneself to any single process-algebraic semantics. Indeed, we show that in the case of operationally deterministic LTSs, all divergence-sensitive equivalences between divergence-sensitive branching bisimilarity and trace + divergence trace equivalence collapse to the same equivalence. The running time of the algorithm is linear except a term that, roughly speaking, grows as slowly as Ackermann’s function grows quickly. If the original LTS is operationally deterministic, the algorithm produces as a by-product a structurally deterministic LTS that is divergence-sensitive branching bisimilar to the original one. This LTS can be minimised like a deterministic finite automaton. The overall approach is so cheap that it makes almost always sense to first try it and revert to a semantics-specific reduction or minimisation algorithm only if the LTS proves operationally nondeterministic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blom, S., Orzan, S.: Distributed branching bisimulation reduction of state spaces. In: PDMC 2003, Parallel and Distributed Model Checking (Satellite workshop of CAV 2003). ENTCS, vol. 89(1), pp. 99–113. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cormen, T., Leiserson, C., Rivest, R., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. De Nicola, R., Vaandrager, F.: Three logics for branching bisimulation. Journal of the ACM 42(2), 458–487 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Eloranta, J.: Minimal Transition Systems with Respect to Divergence Preserving Behavioural Equivalences. PhD thesis, University of Helsinki (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engelfriet, J.: Determinacy \(\longrightarrow\) (observation equivalence = trace equivalence). Theoretical Computer Science 36(1), 21–25 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Groote, J.F., Vaandrager, F.: An efficient algorithm for branching bisimulation and stuttering equivalence. In: Paterson, M. (ed.) ICALP 1990. LNCS, vol. 443, pp. 626–638. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Roscoe, A.W.: CSP and determinism in security modelling. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 114–127. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roscoe, A.W.: The Theory and Practice of Concurrency, p. 565. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan, P.Y.A., Schneider, S.A.: Process algebra and non-interference. In: Proceedings of Computer Security Foundations Workshop, pp. 214–227. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Glabbeek, R.J.: The linear time – branching time spectrum II; the semantics of sequential systems with silent moves. In: Best, E. (ed.) CONCUR 1993. LNCS, vol. 715, pp. 66–81. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van Glabbeek, R.J., Weijland, W.P.: Branching time and abstraction in bisimulation semantics. Journal of the ACM 43(3), 555–600 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Voorhoeve, M., Mauw, S.: Impossible futures and determinism. Information Processing Letters 80(1), 51–58 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Zdancewic, S., Myers, A.: Observational determinism for concurrent program security. In: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, pp. 29–43. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hansen, H., Valmari, A. (2006). Operational Determinism and Fast Algorithms. In: Baier, C., Hermanns, H. (eds) CONCUR 2006 – Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11817949_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11817949_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37376-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37377-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics