Skip to main content

Satisfiability Checking of Non-clausal Formulas Using General Matings

  • Conference paper
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing - SAT 2006 (SAT 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4121))

Abstract

Most state-of-the-art SAT solvers are based on DPLL search and require the input formula to be in clausal form (cnf). However, typical formulas that arise in practice are non-clausal. We present a new non-clausal SAT-solver based on General Matings instead of DPLL search. Our technique is able to handle non-clausal formulas involving ∨,∧,¬ operators without destroying their structure or introducing new variables. We present techniques for performing search space pruning, learning, non-chronological backtracking in the context of a General Matings based SAT solver. Experimental results show that our SAT solver is competitive to current state-of-the-art SAT solvers on a class of non-clausal benchmarks.

This research was sponsored by the Gigascale Systems Research Center (GSRC), the Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC), the Office of Naval Research (ONR), the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), the Army Research Office (ARO), and the General Motors Collaborative Research Lab at CMU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Edimacs format, www.satcompetition.org/2005/edimacs.pdf

  2. Minisat sat solver, http://www.cs.chalmers.se/cs/research/formalmethods/minisat/

  3. SatMate website, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~modelcheck/satmate

  4. Siege (version 4) sat solver, http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~loryan/personal/

  5. TPS and ETPS, http://gtps.math.cmu.edu/tps-papers.html

  6. Andrews, P.B.: Theorem Proving via General Matings. J. ACM 28(2), 193–214 (1981)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrews, P.B.: An Introduction to Mathematical Logic and Type Theory: to Truth through Proof, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bibel, W.: On Matrices with Connections. J. ACM 28(4), 633–645 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganai, M.K., Ashar, P., Gupta, A., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Combining Strengths of Circuit-based and CNF-based Algorithms for a High-performance SAT solver. In: DAC (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg, E., Novikov, Y.: BerkMin: A Fast and Robust Sat-Solver. In: DATE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marques-Silva, J.P., Sakallah, K.A.: GRASP - A New Search Algorithm for Satisfiability. In: ICCAD, pp. 220–227 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McAllester, D., Selman, B., Kautz, H.: Evidence for invariants in local search. In: AAAI, Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 321–326 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meier, A., Sorge, V.: A new set of algebraic benchmark problems for sat solvers. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 459–466. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Moskewicz, M.W., Madigan, C.F., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an efficient SAT solver. In: DAC, June 2001, pp. 530–535 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Plaisted, D.A., Greenbaum, S.: A structure-preserving clause form translation. J. Symb. Comput. 2(3) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smullyan, R.M.: First Order Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Thiffault, C., Bacchus, F., Walsh, T.: Solving Non-clausal Formulas with DPLL Search. In: SAT (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, H.: Sato: An efficient propositional prover. In: CADE-14, pp. 272–275 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, L., Madigan, C.F., Moskewicz, M.W., Malik, S.: Efficient conflict driven learning in boolean satisfiability solver. In: ICCAD, pp. 279–285 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jain, H., Bartzis, C., Clarke, E. (2006). Satisfiability Checking of Non-clausal Formulas Using General Matings. In: Biere, A., Gomes, C.P. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing - SAT 2006. SAT 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4121. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11814948_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11814948_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37206-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37207-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics