Skip to main content

Randomized Wait-Free Consensus Using an Atomicity Assumption

  • Conference paper
Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3974))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a randomized algorithm for asynchronous wait-free consensus using multi-writer multi-reader shared registers. This algorithm is based on earlier work by Chor, Israeli and Li (CIL) and is correct under the assumption that processes can perform a random choice and a write operation in one atomic step. The expected total work for our algorithm is shown to be O(N log(logN)), compared with O(N 2) for the CIL algorithm, and O(N logN) for the best known weak adversary algorithm. We also model check instances of our algorithm using the probabilistic model checking tool PRISM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguilera, M.K., Chen, W., Toueg, S.: Failure detection and consensus in the crach recovery model. Distributed Computing 13(2), 99–125 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aspnes, J., Herlihy, M.: Fast randomized consensus using shared memory. Journal of Algorithms 11(3), 441–461 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Aumann, Y., Kapah-Levy, A.: Cooperative sharing and asynchronous consensus using single-read single-writer registers. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM-SIAM Anuual Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 61–70 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aspnes, J.: Lower bounds for distributed coin-flipping and randomized consensus. Journal of the ACM 45(3), 415–450 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Aspnes, J.: Randomized protocols for asynchronous consensus. Distributed Computing 16(2-3), 165–175 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aumann, Y.: Efficient asynchronous consensus with the weak adversary scheduler. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 209–218 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aspnes, J., Waarts, O.: Randomized consensus in expected O(n log2 n) operations per process. SIAM Journal on Computing 25(5), 1024–1044 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Baier, C., Kwiatkowska, M.: Model checking for a probabilistic branching time logic with fairness. Distributed Computing 11(3), 125–155 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ben-Or, M.: Another advantage of free choice: completely asynchronous agreement protocols. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 27–30 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buhrman, H., Panconesi, A., Silvestri, R., Vitányi, P.M.B.: On the importance of having an identity or is consensus really universal? In: Herlihy, M.P. (ed.) DISC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1914, pp. 134–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bracha, G., Rachman, O.: Randomized consensus in expected O(n 2 logn) operations. In: Toueg, S., Kirousis, L.M., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) WDAG 1991. LNCS, vol. 579, pp. 143–150. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheung, L., Hendriks, M.: Causal dependencies in parallel composition of stochastic processes. Technical Report ICIS-R05020, Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, University of Nijmegen (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chandra, T.D.: Polylog randomized wait-free consensus. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 166–175 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cheung, L.: Collection of PRISM models of the modified CIL algorithm (2005), available at http://www.niii.ru.nl/~lcheung/mcil/

  15. Cheung, L.: Randomized wait-free consensus using an atomicity assumption. Technical Report ICIS-R05035, Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, University of Nijmegen (2005), available at http://www.niii.ru.nl/~lcheung/cilTR.pdf

  16. Chor, B., Israeli, A., Li, M.: On processor coordination using asynchronous hardware. In: Proceedings PODC 1987, pp. 86–97 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chor, B., Israeli, A., Li, M.: Wait-free consensus using asynchronous hardware. SIAM Journal on Computing 23(4), 701–712 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Dwork, C., Lynch, N., Stockmeyer, L.: Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony. Journal of the ACM 35(2), 288–323 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Fich, F., Herlihy, M., Shavit, N.: On the space complexity of randomized synchronization. Journal of the ACM 45(5), 843–862 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer, M., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. Journal of the ACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Israeli, A., Shaham, A.: Optimal multi-writer multi-reader atomic register. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 71–82 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kwiatkowska, M., Norman, G.: Verifying randomized Byzantine agreement. In: Peled, D.A., Vardi, M.Y. (eds.) FORTE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2529, pp. 194–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Kwiatkowska, M., Norman, G., Segala, R.: Automated verification of a randomized distributed consensus protocol using Cadence SMV and PRISM. In: Berry, G., Comon, H., Finkel, A. (eds.) CAV 2001. LNCS, vol. 2102, pp. 194–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. PRISM web site, http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~dxp/prism

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cheung, L. (2006). Randomized Wait-Free Consensus Using an Atomicity Assumption. In: Anderson, J.H., Prencipe, G., Wattenhofer, R. (eds) Principles of Distributed Systems. OPODIS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3974. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11795490_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11795490_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36321-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36322-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics