Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Specification Models for Autonomic Access Control of Digital Rights

  • Conference paper
  • 907 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 3919))

Abstract

One of the goals of Digital Rights Management Systems is the provision of a flexible access rights management system to specify and enforce digital rights. Policy-based access control is an important feature of flexible access management systems as it facilitates changes in access control with minimum or no changes to the system it protects. Two prominent policy based access specification models (and languages) are the Policy Core Information Model (PCIM) and the eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML). In this paper we analyze and compare the two specification models for their suitability in building access rights for Digital Rights Management Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson: Key differences between XACML and EPAL. In: Workshop on New Challenges for Access Control, Ottawa, April 27 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhoopalam, K., Maly, K., Mukkamala, R., Zubair, M.: Access Management in Federated Digital Libraries. In: Proceedings of IADIS, Madrid, October 6-9 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cantor, S. (ed.): Shibboleth Architecture – Protocols and Profiles, Working Draft 05 (November 23, 2004), http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/docs/draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-05.pdf

  4. Common Information Model, Version 2.8 (January 25, 2004), http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim/cim_schema_v281/CIM_Policy28-Final.pdf

  5. Distributed Management Task Force, http://www.dmtf.org/home

  6. eXtensible Markup Language Working Group, www.oasis-open.org/committees/xacml

  7. Godik, S., Moses, T. (eds.): OASIS eXtensible Access Control Management Language (XACML). Committee Specification 1.0 (April 21, 2002), http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/xacml/repository/cs-xacml-core-01.pdf

  8. Hada, S., Kudo, M.: XML Access Control Language: Provisional Authorization for XML Documents. (Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Research) (October 16, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maly, K., Anan, H., Tang, J., Nelson, M., Zubair, M., Yang, Z.: Challenges in Building Federation Services over Harvested Metadata. In: Sembok, T.M.T., Zaman, H.B., Chen, H., Urs, S.R., Myaeng, S.-H. (eds.) ICADL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2911, pp. 602–614. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Martin, M., Agnew, G., Kuhlman, D.L., McNair, J.H., Rhodes, W.A., Tipton, R.: Federated Digital Rights Management: A Proposed DRM Solution for Research and Education. D-Lib Magazine 8(7/8) (July/August 2002) ISSN 1082-9873

    Google Scholar 

  11. Organization for Advancement of Structured Information Systems, http://www.oasis-open.org/home/index.php

  12. OWL Web Ontology Language: Overview (Febuary 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/#s5

  13. Understand the autonomic manager concept (March 2005), http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ac-amconcept/

  14. Vinoski, S.: Web Services Interaction Models - Part 1: Current Practice. In: IEEE Internet Computing, May – June 2002, pp. 89–91 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bhoopalam, K., Maly, K., Mukkamala, R., Zubair, M., Agrawal, D., Kaminsky, D. (2006). A Comparative Study of Specification Models for Autonomic Access Control of Digital Rights. In: Safavi-Naini, R., Yung, M. (eds) Digital Rights Management. Technologies, Issues, Challenges and Systems. DRMTICS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3919. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11787952_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11787952_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35998-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35999-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics