Skip to main content

The Deontic Component of Action Language \(n{\mathcal{C}}+\)

  • Conference paper
Book cover Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems (DEON 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4048))

Abstract

The action language \({\mathcal{C}}+\) of Giunchiglia, Lee, Lifschitz, McCain, and Turner is a formalism for specifying and reasoning about the effects of actions and the persistence (‘inertia’) of facts over time. An ‘action description’ in \({\mathcal{C}}+\) defines a labelled transition system of a certain kind. \(n{\mathcal{C}}+\) (formerly known as \(({\mathcal{C}}+)^{++}\)) is an extended form of \({\mathcal{C}}+\) designed for representing normative and institutional aspects of (human or computer) societies. The deontic component of \(n{\mathcal{C}}+\) provides a means of specifying the permitted (acceptable, legal) states of a transition system and its permitted (acceptable, legal) transitions. We present this component of \(n{\mathcal{C}}+\), motivating its details with reference to some small illustrative examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Giunchiglia, E., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V., McCain, N., Turner, H.: Nonmonotonic causal theories. Artificial Intelligence 153, 49–104 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. CCalc: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/tag/cc

  3. Akman, V., Erdoğan, S.T., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V., Turner, H.: Representing the Zoo World and the Traffic World in the language of the Causal Calculator. Artificial Intelligence 153, 105–140 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Artikis, A., Sergot, M.J., Pitt, J.: Specifying Electronic Societies with the Causal Calculator. In: Giunchiglia, F., Odell, J.J., Weiss, G. (eds.) AOSE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2585, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Artikis, A., Sergot, M.J., Pitt, J.: An executable specification of an argumentation protocol. In: Proc. 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2003), pp. 1–11. ACM Press, Edinburgh (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Sergot, M.: (C  + ) + + : An action language for modelling norms and institutions. Technical Report 2004/8, Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sergot, M.J.: Modelling unreliable and untrustworthy agent behaviour. In: Dunin-Keplicz, B., Jankowski, A., Skowron, A., Szczuka, M. (eds.) Monitoring, Security, and Rescue Techniques in Multiagent Systems. Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 161–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Lomuscio, A., Sergot, M.J.: Deontic interpreted systems. Studia Logica 75(1), 63–92 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Lomuscio, A., Sergot, M.J.: A formalisation of violation, error recovery, and enforcement in the bit transmission problem. J. of Applied Logic 2, 93–116 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer, J.J.C.: A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic. Notre Dame J. of Formal Logic 29(1), 109–136 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Maibaum, T.: Temporal Reasoning over Deontic Specifications. In: Meyer, J.J.C., Wieringa, R.J. (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification, pp. 141–202. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Broersen, J.: Modal Action Logics for Reasoning about Reactive Systems. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Artikis, A., Pitt, J., Sergot, M.J.: Animated specification of computational societies. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) Proc. 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 1053–1062. ACM Press, Bologna (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. van der Torre, L.: Causal deontic logic. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science (Deon 2000), pp. 351–367 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carmo, J., Jones, A.J.I.: Deontic database constraints, violation and recovery. Studia Logica 57(1), 139–165 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Meyden, R.: The dynamic logic of permission. Journal of Logic and Computation 6(3), 465–479 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Belzer, M.: Legal reasoning in 3-D. In: Proc.1st International Conf.on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 155–163. ACM Press, Boston (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sergot, M., Craven, R. (2006). The Deontic Component of Action Language \(n{\mathcal{C}}+\) . In: Goble, L., Meyer, JJ.C. (eds) Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems. DEON 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4048. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11786849_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11786849_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35842-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35843-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics