Skip to main content

Combination of Fuzzy TOPSIS and Fuzzy Ranking for Multi Attribute Decision Making

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing – ICAISC 2006 (ICAISC 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4029))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

TOPSIS is a multiple criteria method to identify solutions from a finite set of alternatives based upon simultaneous minimization of distance from an ideal positive point and maximization of distance from a negative point. Owing to vague concepts frequently represented in decision data, the crisp value is inadequate to model real-life situations. In this paper, the scoring of each alternative and the weight of each criterion are described by linguistic terms which can be expressed in triangular fuzzy numbers. Then, the ratings and weights assigned by decision makers are averaged and normalized into a comparable scale. A coefficient of variation is defined to determine the ranking order of alternatives by calculating the mean value and standard deviation. A numerical example demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M.: Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlsson, C., Fuller, R.: Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: recent developments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78, 139–153 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, C.H.: A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 95, 307–317 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114, 1–9 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubis, D., Prade, H.: Operations on fuzzy numbers. International journal of Systems Science 9, 613–626 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Negi, D.S.: Fuzzy analysis and optimization, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering, Kansas State University (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, E.S., Li, R.L.: Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events. Computer Mathematics Application 15, 887–896 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78, 73–87 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng, H., Yeh, C.H., Willis, R.J.: Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research 27(10), 963–973 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications. Kluwer, Boston (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsu, H.M., Chen, C.T.: Fuzzy credibility relation method for multiple criteria decision-making problems. Information Science 96, 79–91 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu, H.M., Chen, C.T.: Fuzzy credibility relation method for multiple criteria decision-making problems. Information Sciences 96, 79–91 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Buckley, J.J.: Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17, 233–247 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. van Laarhoven, P.J.M., Pedryez, Q.: A fuzzy extension of Satty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11, 229–241 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A.: Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Sci. 17(4), 141–164 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Murakami, S., Maeda, S., Imamura, S.: Fuzzy decision analysis on the development of centralized regional energy control system. In: Proceedings of IFAC Symposium on Fuzzy Information, Knowledge Representation and Decision Analysis (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, S.-J., Hwang, C.-L.: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer, New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, S.J., Hwang, C.L.: Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, New York (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Chu, T.C.: Selecting Plant Location via a Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology 20, 859–864 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mehregan, M.R., Safari, H. (2006). Combination of Fuzzy TOPSIS and Fuzzy Ranking for Multi Attribute Decision Making. In: Rutkowski, L., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Żurada, J.M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing – ICAISC 2006. ICAISC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4029. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11785231_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11785231_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35748-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35750-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics