Skip to main content

Modeling Control Mechanisms with Normative Multiagent Systems: The Case of the Renewables Obligation

  • Conference paper
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3913))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper is about control mechanisms for virtual organizations. As a case study, we discuss the Renewables Obligation (RO), a control mechanism that was introduced in the United Kingdom to stimulate the production of renewable energy. We apply a conceptual model based on normative multiagent systems (NMAS). We propose to model both the participants and the normative system as autonomous agents, having beliefs and goals. Norms, which can be internalized by the agents as obligations, are translated into conditional beliefs and goals of the normative system, which concern both detection and sanctioning measures. We show that the model can handle both the regulative and the evidential aspects of the case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, A.: A reduction of deontic logic to alethic modal logic. Mind 67, 100–103 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin, J.L.: How to do things with words. Harvard U.P., Cambridge, MA (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boella, G., Hulstijn, J., Tan, Y.-H., van der Torre, L.: Transaction trust in normative multiagent systems. In: Castelfranchi, C., Barber, S., Sabater, J., Singh, M. (eds.) Proceedings of AAMAS Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies (Trust 2005), Utrecht, The Nederlands (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: A game theoretic approach to contracts in multiagent systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part C, Special issue on Game-theoretic Analysis and Stochastic Simulation of Negotiation Agents (to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Security policies for sharing knowledge in virtual communities. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A, Special issue on Secure Knowledge Management (to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bons, R.W.H., Dignum, F., Lee, R.M., Tan, Y.-H.: A formal analysis of auditing principles for electronic trade procedures. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 5(1), 57–82 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Van der Torre, L.: Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2(3-4), 431–450 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Castro, J., Kolp, M., Mylopoulos, J.: Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the TROPOS project. Information Systems 27, 365–389 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferber, J.: Multi-Agent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gordijn, J., Tan, Y.-H.: A design methodology for trust and value exchanges in business models. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 9(3), 31 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, J.M.: Value-based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requirements Engineering 8(2), 114–134 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansson, B.: An analysis of some deontic logics. Nôus 3, 373–398 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, A., Carmo, J.: Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties. In: Gabbay, D. (ed.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, pp. 203–279. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kartseva, V., Gordijn, J., Tan, Y.-H.: Value-based business modelling for network organizations: Lessons learned from the electricity sector. In: Becker, J., Bodendorf, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2004), Turku (2004) (CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kartseva, V., Gordijn, J., Tan, Y.-H.: Towards a modelling tool for designing control mechanisms in network organisations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  16. King, A.: 2005/6 review of the renewables obligation statutory consultation. Technical Report september 2005, Department of Trade and Industry, United Kingdom (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, R.M., Bons, R.W.H.: Soft-coded trade procedures for open-edi. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 1(1), 27–49 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Makinson, D., van der Torre, L.: Input/output logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29, 383–408 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. OFGEM. Renewables Obligation - Atlantic Electric and Gas Limited and Maverick Energy Limited. Technical Report R/65, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, United Kingdom (2004), www.ofgas.gov.uk

  20. OFGEM. The renewables obligation: Annual report 2003-2004. Technical Report HC 786, Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, United Kingdom (2004), www.ofgas.gov.uk

  21. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: An eBusiness model ontology for modeling eBusiness. In: Gricar, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference – eReality: Constructing the eEconomy (Bled 2002), pp. 75–91 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sarkar, M.B., Butler, C., Steinfield, B.: Cybermediaries in electronic marketspace: Toward theory building. Journal of Business Research 41, 215–221 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Searle, J.R.: The Construction of Social Reality. The Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sethi, R., Somanathan, E.: The evolution of social norms in common property resource use. American Economuic Review 86(4), 766–789 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tapscott, D., Lowy, A., Ticoll, D.: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Timmers, P.: Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets 8(2), 3–8 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D.: The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3(3), 285–312 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boella, G., Hulstijn, J., Tan, YH., van der Torre, L. (2006). Modeling Control Mechanisms with Normative Multiagent Systems: The Case of the Renewables Obligation. In: Boissier, O., et al. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems. AAMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3913. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35173-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35176-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics