Skip to main content

Verifying Norm Compliancy of Protocols

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3913))

Abstract

There is a wide agreement on the use of norms in order to specify the expected behaviour of agents in open MAS. However, in highly regulated domains, where norms dictate what can and cannot be done, it can be hard to determine whether a desired goal can actually be achieved without violating the norms. To help the agents in this process, agents can make use of predefined (knowledge-based) protocols, which are designed to help reach a goal without violating any of the norms. But how can we guarantee that these protocols are actually norm-compliant? Can these protocols really realise results without violating the norms? In this paper we introduce a formal method, based on program verification, for checking the norm compliance of (knowledge-based) protocols.

The research was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) under project number 634.000.017.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldewereld, H., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Proving norm compliancy of protocols in electronic institutions. Technical Report UU-CS-2005-010, Institute of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boella, G., Lesmo, L.: Deliberative normative agents. In: Dellarocas, C., Conte, R. (eds.) Workshop on Norms and Institutions in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 15–25. ACM-AAAI, ACM Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boman, M.: Norms in artificial decission making. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1), 17–35 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Broersen, J., Dignum, F.P.M., Dignum, V., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Designing a Deontic Logic of Deadlines. In: Lomuscio, A., Nute, D. (eds.) DEON 2004. LNCS, vol. 3065, pp. 43–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F., Jonker, C., Treur, J.: Deliberative Normative Agents: Principles and architecture. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1757, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dignum, F.P.M., Broersen, J., Dignum, V., Meyer, J.-J.: Meeting the deadline: Why, when and how. In: Hinchey, M.G., Rash, J.L., Truszkowski, W.F., Rouff, C.A. (eds.) FAABS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3228, pp. 30–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dignum, F., Morley, D., Sonenberg, E.A.: Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents. In: DEXA Workshop, pp. 1134–1140 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dignum, V.: A Model for Organizational Interaction: based on Agents, founded in Logic. SIKS Dissertation Series 2004-1. SIKS, PhD Thesis (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Estava, M.: Electronic Institutions: from specification to development. PhD thesis, Universitat Politèchnica de Catalunya (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grossi, D., Aldewereld, H., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, F.: Ontological aspects of the implementation of norms in agent-based electronic institutions. In: 1st International Symposium on Normative Multiagent Systems, NorMAS 2005 (accepted, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grossi, D., Dignum, F.P.M.: From abstract to concrete norms in agent institutions. In: Hinchey, M.G., Rash, J.L., Truszkowski, W.F., Rouff, C.A. (eds.) FAABS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3228, pp. 12–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Grossi, D., Dignum, F.P.M., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Contextual taxonomies. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3487, pp. 33–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hart, H.L.A.: The Concept of Law. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kröger, F.: Temporal Logic of Programs. EACTS monographs on theoretical computer science, vol. 8. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. López y Lopez, F.: Social Power and NormsL Impact on Agent Behaviour. PhD thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Univ. of Southampton (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. López y Lopez, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: A framework for norm-based inter-agent dependence. In: Proceedings of The Third Mexican International Conference on Computer Science, pp. 31–40. SMCC-INEGI (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer, J.-J.C., Wieringa, R.J.: Deontic logic: A concise overview. In: Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification, pp. 3–16. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Royakkers, L., Dignum, F.: Giving permission implies giving choice. In: Schweighofer, E. (ed.) 8th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Toulouse, France (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sergot, M.J., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R.A., Kriwaczek, F.: The british nationality act as a logic program. Communications of the ACM 29(5), 370–386 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shoham, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: On social laws for artificial agent societies: Off-line design. Artificial Intelligence 73(1-2), 231–252 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Soeteman, A.: Logic in Law: Remarks on logic and rationality in normative reasoning, especially in law. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Emden, M.H., Kowalski, R.A.: The semantics of predicate logic as a programming language. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 23(4), 733–742 (1976)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Vázquez-Salceda, J., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F.: Implementing norms in multiagent systems. In: Lindemann, G., Denzinger, J., Timm, I.J., Unland, R. (eds.) MATES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3187, pp. 313–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Vázquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, F.P.M.: Modelling electronic organizations. In: Mařík, V., Müller, J.P., Pěchouček, M. (eds.) CEEMAS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2691, pp. 584–593. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Venkatraman, M., Singh, M.P.: Verifying compliance with commitment protocols. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2(3), 217–236 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aldewereld, H., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, F., Meyer, JJ.C. (2006). Verifying Norm Compliancy of Protocols. In: Boissier, O., et al. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems. AAMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3913. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35173-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35176-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics