Abstract
A norm-governed agent takes social norms into account in its practical reasoning. Such norms characterise its role within a specific organisational context. By adopting a role, the agent commits to fulfil and adhere to the social norms associated with that role. These commitments require the agent to act in a way that does not violate any of its prohibitions or obligations. In adopting different sets of norms, an agent may experience conflicts between these norms as well as inconsistencies between possible actions for fulfilling its obligations and its currently adopted set of norms. In order to resolve such problems, it must be informed about conflicts and inconsistencies. The NoA architecture for norm-governed agents implements a computationally efficient mechanism for identifying and indicating such problems – possible candidates for action are assigned a specific label that contains cross-referenced information of actions and norms. As actions are indicated as problematic and not simply filtered out, the agent can still choose to either act according to its norms or against them. The labelling mechanism presented in this paper is therefore a critical step towards enabling an agent to reason about norm violations – the agent becomes norm-autonomous.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bordini, R., Huebner, J.: Jason: A Java-based AgentSpeak Interpreter used with Saci for Multi-Agent Distribution over the Net, Manual (2004)
Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., van der Torre, L.: The BOID architecture: Conflicts between Beliefs, Obligations, Intentions and Desires. In: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents 2001, pp. 9–16 (2001)
Castelfranchi, C.: Modelling Social Action for AI Agents. Artificial Intelligence 103, 157–182 (1998)
Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F., Jonker, C., Treur, J.: Deliberate normative Agents: Principles and Architecture. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1757, pp. 364–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Conte, R., Falcone, R., Sartor, G.: Agents and Norms: How to fill the Gap? Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(1) (March 1999)
Dignum, F.: Autonomous Agents with Norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 69–79 (1999)
Dignum, F., Kinny, D., Sonenberg, L.: From Desires, Obligations and Norms to Goals. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2(3–4), 407–430 (2002)
Firby, R.J.: An Investigation into Reactive Planning in Complex Domains. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intellgence (AAAI), pp. 809–815 (1987)
Forgy, C.L.: Rete: A Fast Algorithm for the Many Pattern / Many Object Pattern Match Problem. Artificial Intelligence 19, 17–37 (1982)
Georgeff, M.P., Lansky, A.: Reactive Reasoning and Planning. In: Proceedings AAAI 1987, Seattle, WA, pp. 677–682 (1987)
Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.: A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power. Journal of the IGPL 4(3), 429–445 (1996)
Kollingbaum, M.J.: Norm-governed Practical Reasoning Agents. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen (2005)
Kollingbaum, M.J., Norman, T.J.: Supervised Interaction - creating a Web of Trust for Contracting Agents in Electronic Environments. In: Castelfranchi, C., Johnson, W. (eds.) First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems AAMAS 2002, pp. 272–279. ACM Press, New York (2002)
Kollingbaum, M.J., Norman, T.J.: Strategies for Resolving Norm Conflict in Practical Reasoning. In: ECAI Workshop CEAS (2004)
Lopez y Lopez, F., Luck, M., dÍnverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, pp. 647–681 (2002)
Norman, T.J., Reed, C.A.: Delegation and Responsibility. In: Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) ATAL 2000. LNCS, vol. 1986, pp. 136–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Pacheco, O., Carmo, J.: A Role Based Model for the Normative Specification of Organized Collective Agency and Agents Interaction. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 6(2), 145–184 (2001)
Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning about Rational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kollingbaum, M.J., Norman, T.J. (2006). Informed Deliberation During Norm-Governed Practical Reasoning. In: Boissier, O., et al. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems. AAMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3913. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35173-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35176-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)