Skip to main content

A Qualitative Evaluation Method for Business Process Tools

  • Conference paper
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2006)

Abstract

The web plays a central role in such diverse application domains as business. As the use of web grows, organizations are increasingly choosing to use it to provide their services to their clients. Services are the systemization of the business processes in the organization. A bad definition and management of the services makes the systematization fail or not to have the expected success. The business process modeling is the first step in the systematization. Due to the great number of modeling tools in existence it is necessary to identify the information that they allow to specify. In this paper, a set of concepts is proposed to evaluate modeling tools for business process modeling using three levels of abstractions –organizational, conceptual and web. The evaluation compares the modeling capabilities supplied by the different techniques. This evaluation also allows determining what modeling tool is the most appropriate to model specific concepts of interest to a particular organization or problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pasley, J.: How BPEKL and SOA are changing web services development. IEEE Internet Computing (May–June 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Green, P.F., Marta Indulska, M.R.: Ontological Evaluation of Enterpri-see systems Interoperability Using ebXML. In: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 17(5). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mersevy, T., Fenstermacher, K.: Transforming software development: and MDA road map. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eriksson, H.E., Penker, M.: Bussiness. Wiley Editorial, Chichester (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meservy, T.O., Fenstermacher, K.D.: Transforming software development: An MDA Road map. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu, E.: Modelling Strategic Relation for Process Reengineering, Universidad de Toronto, Canada (1995); Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ginige, Murugesan, S.:Web Engineering: An Introduction. IEEE Multimedia, 1–5 (January-March 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Green, P.F., Marta Indulska, M.R.: Ontological Evaluation of Enterpri-see systems Interoperability Using ebXML. In: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 17(5). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olsina, L.A.: Metodología cuantitativa para la evaluación y comparación de la calidad de sitios web. Tesis doctoral. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, noviembre de (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dhyani, D., Ng, W.K., Bhowmick, S.S.: A survey of web metrics. ACM computer survey 34(4), 469–503 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bubenko, J., Brash, D., Stirna, J.: EKD User Guide, Royal Institute of technology (KTH) and Stockholm University. Dept. of Computer and Systems Sciences, Sweden (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Insfrán, E., Pastor, O., Wieringa, R.: Requirements Engineering-Based conceptual Modeling. Requirements Engineering 2, 61–72 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gómez, J., Cachero, C., Pastor, O.: Conceptual modeling of device-independent Web applications. IEEE Multimedia 8(2), 26–39 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, L., Yu, E.: Intentional Modeling to support Identity Management. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2004. LNCS, vol. 3288, pp. 555–566. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Fons, J., Pastor, O., Valderas, P., Ruiz, M.: OOWS: Un método de producción de software en ambientes web (2005), http://oomethod.dsic.upv.es/anonimo/.%5Cfiles%5CBookChapter%5Cfons02b.pdf

  16. Carlson, W.L., Thorne, B.: Applied statistical methods economics, and the social sciences. Prentice (May 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Islas P.E., Zabre B.E., Miguel Pérez R.: Evaluación de herramientas de software y hardware para el desarrollo de aplicaciones de realidad virtual, consultado en el (2005), http://www.iie.org.mx/boletin022004/tenden2.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nieto-Ariza, E.M., Rodríguez-Ortiz, G., Ortiz-Hernández, J. (2006). A Qualitative Evaluation Method for Business Process Tools. In: Münch, J., Vierimaa, M. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4034. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11767718_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11767718_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34682-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34683-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics