Skip to main content

Abstract

We address the following dilemma: When making decisions in real life, we often face the problem that, while we have time to contemplate about a problem, we are not entirely sure what the exact parameters of our problem will be. And, on the other hand, as soon as the real world is revealed to us, we need to act quickly and have no more time to rethink our actions extensively.

We suggest an approach that allows to trade uncertainty for time and marginal quality loss and discuss its applicability to combinatorial optimization problems that can be formulated as linear and integer linear programs. The core idea consists in solving a polynomial number of problems in the extensive time period before the day of operation, so that, as soon as complete information is available, a feasible near-optimal solution to the problem can be found in sublinear time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althoefer, I., Berger, F., Schwarz, S.: Generating True Alternatives with a Penalty Method (2002), http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/MathNet/reports/shadows/02-04report.html

  2. Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A.: Robust Optimization - Methodology and Applications. Mathematical Programming Series B 92, 453–480 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Birge, J., Louveaux, F.: Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R.: Online Computation and Competitive Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chinneck, J.W., Ramadan, K.: Linear programming with interval coefficients. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51(2), 209–220 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Elbassioni, K., Katriel, I.: Multiconsistency and Robustness with Global Constraints. In: Barták, R., Milano, M. (eds.) CPAIOR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3524, pp. 168–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Eppstein, D.: Bibliography on k shortest paths and other ”k best solutions” problems (2001), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/-bibs/-kpath.bib

  8. Guestrin, C., Koller, D., Gearhart, C., Kanodia, N.: Generalizing Plans to New Environments in Relational MDPs. In: IJCAI (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hebrard, E., Hnich, B., Walsh, T.: Super Solutions in Constraint Programming. In: Régin, J.-C., Rueher, M. (eds.) CPAIOR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3011, pp. 157–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hulgeri, A., Sudarshan, S.: Parametric Query Optimization for Linear and Piecewise Linear Cost Functions. In: VLDB, pp. 167–178 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lagoudakis, M., Parr, R.: Least-Squares Policy Iteration. Journal of Machine Learning Research 4, 1107–1149 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sameith, I.: On the Generation of Alternative Solutions for Discrete Optimization Problems with Uncertain Data (2004), http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/MathNet/reports/shadows/04-01report.html

  13. Verweij, B., Ahmed, S., Kleywegt, A., Nemhauser, G., Shapiro, A.: The Sample Average Approximation Method Applied to Stochastic Routing Problems: A Computational Study. Computational Optimization and Applications 24(2-3), 289–333 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Vossen, T., Ball, M., Lotem, A., Nau, D.S.: On the Use of Integer Programming Models in AI Planning. In: IJCAI (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yorke-Smith, N.: Reliable Constraint Reasoning with Uncertain Data. PhD thesis, IC-Parc, Imperial College London (June 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yorke-Smith, N., Gervet, C.: Tight and Tractable Reformulations for Uncertain CSPs. In: Proceedings of CP 2004 Workshop on Modelling and Reformulating Constraint Satisfaction Problems, Toronto, Canada (September 2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kenyon, C., Sellmann, M. (2006). Plan B: Uncertainty/Time Trade-Offs for Linear and Integer Programming. In: Beck, J.C., Smith, B.M. (eds) Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems. CPAIOR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3990. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11757375_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11757375_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34306-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34307-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics