Advertisement

Real-Time Feedback on Nonverbal Behaviour to Enhance Social Dynamics in Small Group Meetings

  • Olga Kulyk
  • Jimmy Wang
  • Jacques Terken
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3869)

Abstract

We present a service providing real-time feedback to participants of small group meetings on the social dynamics of the meeting. The service visualizes non-verbal properties of people’s behaviour that are relevant to the social dynamics: speaking time and gaze behaviour. The service was evaluated in two studies, in order to test whether the feedback influences the participants’ visual attention and speaking time and enhances the satisfaction with the group interaction process. In a qualitative evaluation it was found thatgroups in general perceive the social feedback during the meeting as a useful and positive experience, which makes them aware of their group dynamics. In a second study, aiming at a more quantitative analysis, we obtained preliminary evidence that the feedback service affected participants’ behaviour and resulted in more balanced participation and gaze behaviour. We conclude that services providing automatic feedback about relatively low-level behavioural characteristics can enable groups to adjust the social dynamics in group meetings.

Keywords

Visual Attention Feedback Condition Nonverbal Behaviour Meeting Participant Equal Participation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Argyle, M.: Social Interaction. Methuen, London (1969)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakx, I., Turnhout, K., van, T.J.: Facial orientation during multi party interaction with information kiosks. In: Proceedings of Interact 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basu, S.: Towards measuring human interactions in conversational settings. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International workshop on Cues in Communication CUES (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DiMicco, J., Pandolfo, A., Bender, W.: Influencing group participation with a shared display. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, pp. 614–623 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hogg, M.A.: The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness. From Attraction to Social Identity, Harvester Wheatsheaf (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janis, I.: Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1972)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kendon, A.: Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica 26, 22–63 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kraemer, K., King, J.: Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making. ACM Computing Surveys 20, 115–146 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGrath, J.: Time, interaction and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research 22, 147–174 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olaniran, B.A.: A Model of Group Satisfaction in Computer-Mediated Communication and Face-to-Face Meetings. Behaviour and Information Technology 15, 24–36 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parker, K.: Speaking turns in small group interaction: A context sensitive event sequencing model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 956–971 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paul, S., Seetharaman, P., Ramamurthy, K.: User Satisfaction with System, Decision Process, and Outcome in GDSS Based Meeting: An Experimental Investigation. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pianesi, F. (ed.): User Requirements and Scenarios Evaluation for the Various Services. Deliverable 3.1 of the CHIL project. ITC-IRST (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation Language. Journal of the linguistic society of America 50, 696–735 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silver, S.D., Cohen, B.P., Crutchfield, J.H.: Status differentiation and information exchange in face-to-face and computer-mediated idea generation. Social Psychology Quarterly 57, 108–123 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaw, M.: Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior. McGraw Hill, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stiefelhagen, R., Zhu, J.: Head orientation and gaze direction in meetings. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2002, pp. 858–859 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stasser, G., Stewart, D.: Discovery of Hidden Profiles by Decision Making Groups: Solving a Problem versus Making a Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 426–434 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takemae, Y., Otsuka, K., Mukawa, N.: Video cut editing rule based on participants’ gaze in multiparty conversation. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 303–306 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vertegaal, R., Slagter, R., Veer, G.: Eye gaze patterns in conversations: There is more to conversational agents than meets the eye. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2001, pp. 301–308 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Kulyk
    • 1
  • Jimmy Wang
    • 1
  • Jacques Terken
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial DesignEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations