Skip to main content

The Algorithmic Structure of Group Strategyproof Budget-Balanced Cost-Sharing Mechanisms

  • Conference paper
STACS 2006 (STACS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3884))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study mechanisms for cooperative cost-sharing games satisfying: voluntary participation (i.e., no user is forced to pay more her valuation of the service), consumer sovereignty (i.e, every user can get the service if her valuation is large enough), no positive transfer (i.e., no user receives money from the mechanism), budget balance (i.e., the total amount of money that users pay is equal to the cost of servicing them), and group strategyproofness (i.e., the mechanism is resistant to coalitions).

We show that mechanisms satisfying all these requirements must obey certain algorithmic properties (which basically specify how the serviced users are selected). Our results yield a characterization of upper continuous mechanisms (this class is interesting as all known general techniques yield mechanisms of this type). Finally, we extend some of our negative results and obtain the first negative results on the existence of mechanisms satisfying all requirements above. We apply these results to an interesting generalization of cost-sharing games in which the mechanism cannot service certain “forbidden” subsets of users. These generalized cost-sharing games correspond to natural variants of known cost-sharing games and have interesting practical applications (e.g., sharing the cost of multicast transmissions which cannot be encrypted).

Work supported by the European Project FP6-15964, Algorithmic Principles for Building Efficient Overlay Computers (AEOLUS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biló, V., Di Francescomarino, C., Flammini, M., Melideo, G.: Sharing the cost of muticast transmissions in wireless networks. In: Proc. of SPAA, pp. 180–187. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Immorlica, N., Mahdian, M., Mirrokni, V.: Limitations of cross-monotonic cost-sharing schemes. In: Proc. of the 16th SODA, ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jain, K., Vazirani, V.V.: Applications of approximation algorithms to cooperative games. In: Proc. of the 33rd STOC, pp. 364–372. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kent, K., Skorin-Kapov, D.: Population monotonic cost allocation on MST’s. In: Operational Research Proceedings KOI, vol. 43-48 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Könemann, J., Leonardi, S., Schäfer, G.: A group-strategyproof mechanism for Steiner forests. In: Proc. of the 16th SODA, ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leonardi, S., Schäfer, G.: Cross-monotonic cost-sharing methods for connected facility location games. In: Proc. of the 5th ACM EC, pp. 242–243 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, X., Sun, Z., Wang, W.: Cost sharing and strategyproof mechanisms for set cover games. In: Diekert, V., Durand, B. (eds.) STACS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3404, pp. 218–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Megiddo, N.: Cost allocation for steiner trees. Networks 8, 1–6 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Moulin, H.: Incremental cost sharing: characterization by coalition strategy-proofness. Social Choice and Welfare 16, 279–320 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Moulin, H., Shenker, S.: Strategyproof sharing of submodular costs: budget balance versus efficiency (1997), http://www.aciri.org/shenker/cost.ps

  11. Myerson, R.: Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 58–73 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pàl, M., Tardos, É.: Strategy proof mechanisms via primal-dual algorithms. In: Proc. of the 44th IEEE FOCS (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Penna, P., Ventre, C.: The algorithmic structure of group strategyproof budget-balanced cost-sharing mechanisms, Available at: http://www.dia.unisa.it/~ventre

  14. Penna, P., Ventre, C.: More powerful and simpler cost-sharing methods. In: Persiano, G., Solis-Oba, R. (eds.) WAOA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3351, pp. 97–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Penna, P., Ventre, C.: Free-riders in steiner tree cost-sharing games. In: Pelc, A., Raynal, M. (eds.) SIROCCO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3499, pp. 231–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 8–37 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Penna, P., Ventre, C. (2006). The Algorithmic Structure of Group Strategyproof Budget-Balanced Cost-Sharing Mechanisms. In: Durand, B., Thomas, W. (eds) STACS 2006. STACS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3884. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11672142_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11672142_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32301-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32288-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics