Skip to main content

Reusability Analysis of Four Standard Object-Oriented Class Libraries

  • Conference paper
Software Engineering Research and Applications (SERA 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3647))

Abstract

Class libraries play a key role in object-oriented paradigm. They provide, by and large, the most commonly reused components in object-oriented environments. In this paper, we use a number of metrics to study reusability of four standard class libraries of two object oriented languages; namely Java and Eiffel. The purpose of the study is to demonstrate how different design philosophies of the two languages have affected structural design and organization of their standard libraries that in turn might have affected their reusability with regards to Ease of Reuse and Design with Reuse. Our study concludes that within limits of our measurements, the Java libraries are easy to reuse whereas Eiffel libraries are better designed with reuse. We observe that whilst design with reuse may make class libraries extensible and maintainable, but it does not necessarily make them easy to reuse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albrecht, A.J.: Measuring application development productivity. In: IBM Applications Development Symp. (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biemanand, J., Karunanithi, S.: Candidate reuse metrics for object oriented and ada software.In IEEE-CS 1st International Software Metrics Symposium (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boisvert, R.F., Dongarra, J., Pozo, R., Remington, K., Stewart, G.: Oops: an object-oriented Particle simulation class library for distributed architectures. Concurrency: Practice and Experience 10(11-13), 1117–1129 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: Ametrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20(6), 476–493 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fichman, R.G., Kemerer, C.F.: Object technology and reuse: Lessons from early adopters. IEEE Computer 30(10), 47–59 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frakes, W., Terry, C.: Software reuse: Metrics and models. ACM Computing Surveys 28(2), 415–435 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hastings, T.E., Sajeev, A.S.M.: A vector based approach to software size measurement and effort estimation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27(4), 337–350 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Henderson, R., Zorn, B.: A comparison of oo programming in four modern languages. Software Practice and Experience 24(11), 1077–1095 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Henderson-Sellers, B.: Object-Oriented Metrics: Measures of Complexity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hitz, M.: Measuring reuse attributes in object-oriented systems. In: Int. Conf. on Object Oriented Info. Systems, Dublin, Ireland (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horstmann, C.S., Cornel, G.: Core Java. Sunsoft Press, Mountain View (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobson, I.: Software Reuse: Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success. ACM Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kage, H., Sttzel, H.: Hume: An object oriented component library for generic modular modelling of dynamic systems. In: Donatelli, M., Stockle, C., Villalobos, F., Villar, J. (eds.) Modelling cropping systems, Lleida. European Society of Agronomy, pp. 299–300 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer, B.: Eiffel: TheLanguage, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer, B.: Reusable Software: The Base Object-Oriented Component Libraries. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pozo, R.: Template numerical toolkit. Technical report, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prieto-Diaz, R.: Status report: softwarere usability. IEEE Software, 61–66 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reynders, J.V.W., Forslund, D.W., Hinker, P.J., Tholburn, M., Kilman, D.G., Humphrey, W.F.: Developing numerical libraries in java. Computer Physics Communications 87(1-2), 212–224 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt, H.W., Omohundro, S.: Clos, eiffel and sather: Acomparison. Technical report, International Computer Science Institute (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Araban, S., Sajeev, A.S.M. (2006). Reusability Analysis of Four Standard Object-Oriented Class Libraries. In: Dosch, W., Lee, R.Y., Wu, C. (eds) Software Engineering Research and Applications. SERA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3647. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11668855_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11668855_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32133-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32134-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics