Abstract
Ring signature scheme, proposed by Rivest et al., allows a signer to sign a message anonymously. In the ring signature scheme, the signer who wants to sign a document anonymously first chooses some public keys of entities (signers) and then generates a signature which ensures that one of the signer or entities signs the document. In some situations, however, this scheme allows the signer to shift the blame to victims because of the anonymity. The group signature scheme may be a solution for the problem; however, it needs a group manager (electronic big brother) who can violate the signer anonymity without notification, and a complicated key setting.
This paper introduces a new concept of a signature scheme with signer anonymity, a deniable ring signature scheme ( \(\mathcal{DRS}\)), in which no group manager exists, and the signer should be involved in opening the signer anonymity. We also propose a concrete scheme proven to be secure under the assumption of the DDH (decision Diffie Hellman) problem in the random oracle model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abdalla, M., Warinschi, B.: On the minimal assumptions of group signature schemes. In: López, J., Qing, S., Okamoto, E. (eds.) ICICS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3269, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Abe, M., Ohkubo, M., Suzuki, K.: 1-out-of-n signatures from a variety of keys. IEICE Transactions Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences E87–A(1), 131–140 (2004)
Ateniese, G., Camenisch, J., Joye, M., Tsudik, G.: A practical and provably secure coalition-resistant group signature scheme. In: Bellare, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2000. LNCS, vol. 1880, pp. 255–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Bellare, M., Micciancio, D., Warinschi, B.: Foundations of group signatures: Formal definitions, simplified requirements, and a construction based on general assumptions. In: Biham, E. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2656, pp. 614–629. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Bellare, M., Rogaway, P.: Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In: Proc. of the First ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 62–73. ACM Press, New York (1993)
Bellare, M., Shi, H., Zhang, C.: Foundations of group signatures: The case of dynamic groups. In: Menezes, A. (ed.) CT-RSA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3376, pp. 136–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Boneh, D.: The decision diffie-hellman problem. In: Buhler, J. (ed.) ANTS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1423, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Camenisch, J., Groth, J.: Group signatures: Better efficiency and new theoretical aspect. In: Blundo, C., Cimato, S. (eds.) SCN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3352, pp. 120–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Chaum, D.: Zero-knowledge undeniable signatures. In: Damgård, I. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1990. LNCS, vol. 473, pp. 458–464. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Chaum, D., Pedersen, P.: Wallet databases with observers. In: Brickell, E.F. (ed.) CRYPTO 1992. LNCS, vol. 740, pp. 89–105. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Chaum, D., van Heyst, E.: Group signatures. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 257–265. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Cramer, R., Damgård, I., Schoenmakers, B.: Proofs of partial knowledge and simplified design of witness hiding protocols. In: Desmedt, Y.G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1994. LNCS, vol. 839, pp. 174–187. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)
Naor, M.: Deniable ring authentication. In: Yung, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2002. LNCS, vol. 2442, pp. 481–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Ogata, W., Kurosawa, K., Heng, S.-H.: The security of the fdh variant of chaum’s undeniable signature scheme. In: Vaudenay, S. (ed.) PKC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3386, pp. 328–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Okamoto, T., Pointcheval, D.: The gap-problems: A new class of problems for the security of cryptographic schemes. In: Kim, K.-c. (ed.) PKC 2001. LNCS, vol. 1992, pp. 104–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Pointcheval, D., Stern, J.: Security arguments for digital signatures and blind signatures. Journal of Cryptology 13(3), 361–396 (2000)
Rivest, R.L., Shamir, A., Tauman, Y.: How to leak a secret. In: Boyd, C. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2248, pp. 526–565. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Komano, Y., Ohta, K., Shimbo, A., Kawamura, S. (2006). Toward the Fair Anonymous Signatures: Deniable Ring Signatures. In: Pointcheval, D. (eds) Topics in Cryptology – CT-RSA 2006. CT-RSA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3860. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11605805_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11605805_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31033-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32648-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)