Abstract
Signcryption denotes a cryptographic method, which can process encryption and digital signature simultaneously. So, adopting such schemes, computational cost of encryption and signature compared to traditional signature-then-encryption can be reduced to a great extent. Based on the existing distributed signcryption schemes, Kwak and Moon proposed a new distributed signcryption scheme with sender ID confidentiality and extended it to a group signcryption. Their scheme is more efficient in both communication and computation aspects. Unfortunately we will demonstrate that their scheme is insecure by identifying some security flaws. Exploring these flaws, an attacker without any secret can mount universal forging attacks. That is, anyone (not necessary the group member) can forge valid group signatures on arbitrary messages of his/her choice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Zheng, Y.: Digital signcryption or how to achieve cost (Signature & encryption) < < cost(Signature) + cost(Encryption). In: Kaliski Jr., B.S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1997. LNCS, vol. 1294, pp. 165–179. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Bao, F., Deng, R.H.: A signcryption scheme with signature directly verifiable by public key. In: Imai, H., Zheng, Y. (eds.) PKC 1998. LNCS, vol. 1431, pp. 55–59. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Kwak, D., Ha, J., Lee, H., Kim, H., Moon, S.: A WTLS handshake protocol with user anonymity and forward secrecy. In: Lee, J.-Y., Kang, C.-H. (eds.) CIC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2524, pp. 219–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Lee, K., Moon, S.: AKA protocol for mobile communications. In: Clark, A., Boyd, C., Dawson, E.P. (eds.) ACISP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1841, pp. 400–411. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Mu, Y., Varadharajan, V.: Distributed signcryption. In: Roy, B., Okamoto, E. (eds.) INDOCRYPT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1977, pp. 155–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Kwak, D., Moon, S.: Efficient Distributed Signcryption Scheme as Group Signcryption. In: Zhou, J., Yung, M., Han, Y. (eds.) ACNS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2846, pp. 403–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Ateniese, G., Camenisch, J., Joye, M., Tsudik, G.: A practical and provably secure coalition-resistant group signature scheme. In: Bellare, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2000. LNCS, vol. 1880, pp. 255–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Bresson, E., Stern, J.: Efficient revocation in group signatures. In: Kim, K.-c. (ed.) PKC 2001. LNCS, vol. 1992, pp. 190–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Camenisch, J., Stadler, M.: Efficient group signature schemes for large groups. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1997. LNCS, vol. 1294, pp. 410–424. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Lyuu, Y., Wu, M.: Convertible Group Undeniable Signatures. In: Lee, P.J., Lim, C.H. (eds.) ICISC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2587, pp. 48–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bao, H., Cao, Z., Qian, H. (2005). On the Security of a Group Signcryption Scheme from Distributed Signcryption Scheme. In: Desmedt, Y.G., Wang, H., Mu, Y., Li, Y. (eds) Cryptology and Network Security. CANS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3810. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11599371_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11599371_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30849-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32298-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)