Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agents Enacting Social Roles. Balancing Formal Structure and Practical Rationality in MAS Design

  • Chapter
Socionics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3413))

Abstract

We introduce an integrated approach to the conceptualisation, implementation and evaluation of a MAS (multi-agent system) which is based on sociological concepts of practical roles and organisational coordination via negotiations. We propose a middle level of scale, located between interaction and the overall organisational structure, as the starting point for MAS design, with formal and practical modes of coordination to be distinguished over all relevant levels of scale. In our contribution, we present the modelling principles of our MAS, the agent architecture and the implementation. In the next step the approach is extended to a methodology for the investigation of processes of hybridisation, which means the re-entering of artificial sociality in a real-world domain. The integrated approach is intended to contribute to a generalised understanding of the Socionics program, which in our view should be seen as the enrolment of independent, but subsequent steps in an overall interdisciplinary approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. Artificial Intelligence Communications, 7(1), 39–59 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aldrich, H.: Organizations evolving. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Almog, O.: The Problem of Social Type: A Review. Electronic Journal of Sociology (1998), http://www.sociology.org/content/vol003.004/almog.html (12.11.2002)

  4. Arrow, K.J.: Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Atteslander, P.: Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Berlin, de Gruyter (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beer, M., d’Inverno, M., Luck, M., Jennings, N., Preist, C., Schroeder, M.: Negotiation in multi-agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 14(3), 285–289 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berg, M., Toussaint, P.: The mantra of modelling and the forgotten powers of paper: A sociotechnical view on the development of process-oriented ICT in health care (06.08.2002), http://www.bmg.eur.nl/smw/publications/mantra.pdf

  8. Bourdieu, P.: Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In: Kreckel, R. (ed.) Soziale Ungleichheiten, pp. 183–198. Schwartz, Göttingen (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bourdieu, P.: Sozialer Raum und Klassen/ Lecon sur la Lecon. Zwei Vorlesungen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bourdieu, P.: The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burkhard, H.-D.: Software-Agenten. In: Görz, G., Rollinger, C.R., Schneeberger, J. (eds.) Handbuch der künstlichen Intelligenz, 3rd edn., pp. 981–986. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, München (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burkhard, H.-D., Rammert, W.: Integration kooperationsfähiger Agenten in komplexen Organisationen. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Gestaltung hybrider offener Systeme. Technical University – Technology Studies Working Papers, TUTS-WP-1-2001. Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, TU Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L., Turner, W., Gasser, L. (eds.): Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work. Beyond the great divide. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NY

    Google Scholar 

  14. Castelfranchi, C.: Formalising the informal? Dynamic social order, bottom-up social control, and spontaneous normative relations. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic. (2003), http://alfebiite.ee.ic.ac.uk/docs/papers/D3/1.Castel-Deon.pdf (20.11.2003)

  15. Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1), 1–25 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, D.T.: Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. In: Denzin, N. (ed.) Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 243–263 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dahrendorf, R.: Homo Sociologicus: Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der Kategorie der sozialen Rolle. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  18. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2), 147–160 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenführ, F.: Rationales Entscheiden, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Esser, H.: Soziologie – Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 1: Situationslogik und Handeln, Campus, Frankfurt a.M (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fischer, K., Müller, J.P., Pischel, M.: A pragmatic BDI architecture. In: Huhns, M.N., Singh, M.P. (eds.) Readings in Agents, pp. 217–224. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geller, H.: Position, Rolle, Situation. Zur Aktualisierung soziologischer Analyseinstrumente, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gerstl, R., Osherenko, A., Lindemann, G.: The description of formal roles in hospital environments. In: Lindemann, G., Moldt, D., Polucci, M., Yu, B. (eds.) RASTA 2002, pp. 123–130 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gonzales Campanini, I., Holler, G.: Die Neuordnung des Pflegedienstes in einem städtischen Krankenhaus. Ergebnisse der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung in den Städtischen Kliniken Frankfurt a.M.-Höchst. Universität Hannover (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gotsch, W.: Soziale Steuerung – zum fehlenden Konzept einer Debatte. In: Glagow, M., Willke, H. (eds.): Dezentrale Gesellschaftssteuerung: Probleme der Integration polyzentrischer Gesellschaften. Centaurus, Pfaffenweiler, pp. 27–44 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Janning, F.: Abschied von der Hierarchie? Dezentralisierung in mittelständischen Unternehmen. Rainer Hampp Verlag, München (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10(2), 199–215 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Landesman, C.: The voluntary provision of public goods. PhD thesis, Princeton University (access date: 11,20, 1995), http://www.nonprofits.org/parlor/acknow/landesman/vpopg.html

  29. Laux, H.: Entscheidungstheorie. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Lenz, M.: Case retrieval nets as a model for building flexible information systems. Dissertation, Humboldt University, Berlin (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lettkemann, E., Meister, M., Hanft, A., Schröter, K., Malitz, R.: The description of practical roles in hospital environments. In: Lindemann, G., Jonker, C., Timm, I.J. (eds.): Proceedings of the MASHO Workshop: Modelling Artificial Societies and Hybrid Organizations. 25th German Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Aachen, Germany, pp. 29–36 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Malsch, T.: Naming the unnamable: Socionics or the sociological turn of/ to distributed artificial intelligence. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 4(3), 155–186 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. March, J.G., Simon, H.: Organizations. Wiley, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meister, M., Urbig, D., Gerstl, R., Lettkemann, E., Osherenko, A., Schröter, K.: Die Modellierung praktischer Rollen für Verhandlungssysteme in Organisationen.Wie die Komplexität von Multiagentensystemen durch Rollenkonzeptionen erhöht werden kann.Working paper tuts-wp-6-2002, Technical University – Technology Studies, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Merton, R.K.: The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. British Journal of Sociology 8, 106–120 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Meyer, J.W., Rowan, B.: Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Morgan, M., Morrison, M.: Models as mediators. In: Perspectives on natural and social sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Mueller, J.: The Design of Intelligent Agents: A layered approach LNCS, vol. 1177. Springer, Berlin (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Orlikowski, W.J.: The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3(3), 398–427 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pages, R.: Das Experiment in der Soziologie. In: König, R. (ed.) Handbuch der empirischen Sozialforschung, pp. 273–342. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Popitz, H.: Der Begriff der sozialen Rolle als Element der soziologischen Theorie. J.C.B. Mohr,Tübingen (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Prinz, W., Jarke, M., Rogers, Y., Schmidt, K., Wulf, V. (eds.): ECSCW 2001. Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16–20, Bonn, Germany. Kluver, Dordrecht (September 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rammert, W.: Technik als verteilte Aktion. Wie technisches Wirken als Agentur in hybriden Aktionszusammenhängen gedeutet werden kann. Working paper tuts-wp-3-2002, Technical University – Technology Studies, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rammert, W., Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Technik und Handeln. Wenn soziales Handeln sich auf menschliches Verhalten und technische Abläufe verteilt. In: Rammert, W., Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (eds.): Können Maschinen handeln? Soziologische Beiträge zum Verhältnis von Mensch und Technik. Campus, Frankfurt a.M., pp. 11–64 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture. In: Fikes, R., and Sandewall, E. (eds.): Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KRR 1991), San Mateo, CA, pp. 473–484 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rohde, J.: Soziologie des Krankenhauses. In: Zur Einführung in die Soziologie der Medizin, Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Scharpf, F.: Interaktionsformen. In: Akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung, Leske und Budrich, Opladen (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Sozialtheorie der Technik. Campus, Frankfurt a.M (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Enrolling software agents in human organizations. The exploration of hybrid organizations within the Socionics research program. In: Saam, N.J., Schmidt, B. (eds.) Cooperative agents. Applications in the social sciences, pp. 149–163. Kluver Academic Press, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Strübing, J.: Bridging the Gap: On the collaboration between Symbolic Interactionism and Distributed Artificial Intelligence in the field of Multi-Agent Systems Research. Symbolic Interaction 21(4), 441–464 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Suchman, L.: Plans and situated actions. In: The problem of man-machine communication, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Turner, R.H.: Role-taking: Process versus conformity. In: Rose, A.M. (ed.): Human behavior and social process. An interactionist perspective. Routledge, London, pp. 20–40 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Urbig, D., Monett Díaz, D., Schröter, K.: The C-IPS Agent Architecture for modeling negotiating social agents. In: Schillo, M., Klusch, M., Müller, J., Tianfield, H. (eds.) MATES 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2831, pp. 217–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. Wenger, E.: Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10(2), 115–162 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zimmermann, E.: Das Experiment in den Sozialwissenschaften. Teubner, Stuttgart (1972)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Sociology, Technology Studies, Technical University Berlin,  

    Martin Meister & Renate Gerstl

  2. Department of Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence Group, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin,  

    Diemo Urbig & Kay Schröter

Authors
  1. Martin Meister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diemo Urbig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kay Schröter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Renate Gerstl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DFKI GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Klaus Fischer

  2. Department of Technology Assessment, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstrasse 95, 21071, Hamburg, Germany

    Michael Florian

  3. Department of Technology Assessment, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstr. 95, 21071, Hamburg, Germany

    Thomas Malsch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meister, M., Urbig, D., Schröter, K., Gerstl, R. (2005). Agents Enacting Social Roles. Balancing Formal Structure and Practical Rationality in MAS Design. In: Fischer, K., Florian, M., Malsch, T. (eds) Socionics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3413. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11594116_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11594116_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30707-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31613-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation