Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Conditional Commitments to Generalized Media: On Means of Coordination Between Self-Governed Entities

  • Chapter
Socionics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3413))

  • 612 Accesses

Abstract

In the absence of pre-established coordination structures, what can a self-governed entity—i.e. an entity that chooses on its own between its possible actions and cannot be controlled externally—do to evoke another self-governed entity’s cooperation? In this paper, the motivating conditional self-commitment is conceived to be the basic mechanism to solve coordination problems of this kind. It will be argued that such commitments have an inherent tendency to become more and more generalized and institutionalised. The sociological concept of generalized symbolic media is reinterpreted as a concept that focuses on this point. The conceptual framework resulting from the considerations is applicable to coordination problems between human actors as well as to coordination problems between artificial agents in open multi-agent systems. Thus, it may help to transfer solutions from one realm to the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Van de Velde, W., Perram, J.P.: Preface. In: Perram, J., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS, vol. 1038, pp. V–X Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Jennings, N.R.: Coordination Techniques for Distributed Artificial Intelligence. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 187–210. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parsons, T., Shils, E.: Some Fundamental Categories of the Theory of Action. A General Statement. In: Parsons, T., Shils, E. (eds.) Toward a General Theory of Action, pp. 3–29. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esser, H.: Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 3: Soziales Handeln. Campus, Frankfurt/Main (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shoham, Y.: Agent-oriented Programming. Artificial Intelligence 60, 51–92 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Haddadi, A., Sundermeyer, K.: Belief-Desire-Intention Agent Architectures. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 169–210. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mead, G.H.: Mind, Self, and Society. From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, vol. 14. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Durkheim, E.: The Rules of Sociological Method. Free Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luhmann, N.: Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Habermas, J.: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 1 und 2. Vierte, durchgesehene Auflage edn. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kant, I.: Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Meiner, Hamburg (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krohn, W.: Das Risiko des (Nicht-)Wissens. Zum Funktionswandel der Wissenschaft in der Wissensgesellschaft. In: Böschen, S., Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (eds.) Wissenschaft in derWissensgesellschaft, pp. 97–118. Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parsons, T.: On the Concept of Influence. Public Opinion Quarterly 27, 37–62 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parsons, T.: Social Structure and the Symbolic Media of Interchance. In: Blau, P.M. (ed.) Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, pp. 94–120. Free Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luhmann, N.: Einführende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie symbolisch generalisierter Kommunikationsmedien. In: Luhmann, N. (ed.) Soziologische Aufklärung. Band 2: Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft, pp. 170–192. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luhmann, N.: Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Esser, H.: Soziologie. Allgemeine Grundlagen. Campus, Frankfurt/Main (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marx, K.: Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band. 4., durchgesehene Auflage, Hamburg 1890 edn. Dietz Verlag, Berlin (1971(1890))

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parsons, T.: On the Concept of Political Power. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107, 232–262 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schimank, U.: Theorien gesellschaftlicher Differenzierung. 2. Aufl. edn. Leske + Budrich, Opladen (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Merton, R.K.: Priorities in Scientific Discovery. American Sociological Review 22, 635–659 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luhmann, N.: Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merton, R.K.: The matthew effect in science. Science 159, 56–63 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zuckerman, H., Merton, R.K.: Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, Structure and Functions of the Referee System. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 9, 66–100 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Giddens, A.: The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Menger, C.: Ueber das exacte (das atomistische) Verständnis des Ursprungs jener Socialgebilde, welche das unreflectirte Ergebnis gesellschaftlicher Entwickelung sind. In: Menger, C. (ed.) Untersuchungen über die Methode der Sozialwissenschaften und der politischen Ö konomie insbesondere. GesammelteWerke, hrsg. mit einer Einleitung und einem Schriftenverzeichnis von F. A. Hayek, vol. Bd., 2. Aulf edn., pp. 171–183. Mohr, Tübingen (1969(1883))

    Google Scholar 

  28. Conte, R.: Emergent (Info)Institutions. Cognitive Systems Research 2, 97–110 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Davis, R., Smith, R.: Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence 20, 63–109 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Vergesellschaftung und Vergemeinschaftung künstlicher Agenten. Sozialvorstellungen in der Multiagenten-Forschung. Research Reports RR 3, Technikbewertung und Technikgestaltung, TU Hamburg-Harburg, Hamburg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wellman, M.P.: A General-Equilibrium Approach to Distributed Transportation Planning. In: Szolovits, P. (ed.) AAAI 1992. Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, California, July 1992, pp. 282–289. AAAI Press,The MIT Press, Menlo Park (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lesser, V.R., Corkhill, D.D.: The distributed vehicle monitoring testbed: A tool for investigating distributed problem solving networks. The AI Magazine 4, 15–33 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Durfee, E.H., Lesser, V.R., Corkhill, D.D.: Trends in Cooperative Distributed Problem Solving. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering I, 63–83 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martial, F.v.: Coordinating Plans of Autonomous Agents. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Davis, R.: Report on the Workshop on Distributed AI. Sigart Newsletter 73, 42–52 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shoham, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: On the Synthesis of Useful Social Laws for Artificial Agents Societies (Preliminary Report). In: Szolovits, P. (ed.) AAAI 1992. Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, California, July 1992, pp. 276–281. AAAI Press,The MIT Press, Menlo Park (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Castelfranchi, C.: Social Power. A Point Missed in Multi-Agent, DAI and HCI. In: Müller, J.P. (ed.) Dezentralized AI. Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, pp. 49–63. Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Mind is Not Enough: The Cognitive Bases of Social Interaction. In: Doran, J. (ed.) Simulating Societies. The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena, pp. 267–286. UCL-Press, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Innovation durch Konzeptübertragung. Der Rückgriff auf Bekanntes bei der Erzeugung, technischer Neuerungen am Beispiel der Multiagentensystem-Forschung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 31, 232–251 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hewitt, C.E.: Offices are Open Systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4, 271–287 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hewitt, C.E.: Open information systems semantics for distributed artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 47, 79–106 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Finin, T., Weber, J., Wiederhold, G., Genesereth, M., McKay, D., Fritzson, R., Shapiro, S., Pelavin, R., McGuire, J.: Specification of KQML Agent-Communication Language plus Example Agent Policies and Architectures. (Draft) Working Paper of the DARPA Knowledge Sharing Initiative External Interfaces Working Group (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Labrou, Y., Finin, T.: A Proposal for a new KQML Specification. Technical Report TR CS- 97-03, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department, University of Maryland, Maryland, Baltimore County, MD 21250 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bond, A.H.: A Computational Model for Organization of Cooperating Intelligent Agents. In: Lochovsky, F.H., Allen, R.B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Conference on Office Information Systems, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 21–30 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention Is Choice with Commitment. Artifical Intelligence 42, 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Jennings, N.R.: Coordination: Commitment and Conventions: The Foundation of Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 8, 223–250 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Castelfranchi, C.: Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations. In: Lesser, V. (ed.) ICMAS 1995. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, June 12-14, pp. 41–48. AAAI Press,The MIT Press, Menlo Park (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Castelfranchi, C., Conte, R.: Distributed Artificial Intelligence and Social Science: Critical Issues. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 527–542. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Michel, A., Senteni, A.: Emotions as Commitments Operators: A Foundation for Control Structure in Multi-Agent Systems. In: Perram, J., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS, vol. 1038, pp. 13–25. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Rosenschein, J.R., Genesereth, M.R.: Deals Among Rational Agents. In: Gasser, L. (ed.) Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 227–234. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Marsh, S.: Trust in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. In: Castelfranchi, C., Werner, E. (eds.) MAAMAW 1992. LNCS, vol. 830, pp. 94–114. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Principles of Trust for MAS: Cognitive Anatomy, Social Importance, and Quantification. In: ICMAS 1998. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 72–79. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Conte, R., Paolucci, M.: Reputation in Artificial Societies. Social Beliefs for Social Order. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Castelfranchi, C., Conte, R., Paolucci, M.: Normative Reputation and the Costs of Compliance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1 (1998), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/3/3.html

  55. online, S.: eBay-Sicherheitsloch: Wie ein Träumer das Bewertungssystem aushebelte. Spiegel Online (2003), http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzkultur/0,1518,236673,00.html

  56. Schulz-Schaeffer, I.: Enrolling Software Agents in Human Organizations. The Exploration of Hybrid Organizations within the Socionics Research Program. In: Saam, N.J., Schmidt, B. (eds.) Cooperative Agents. Applications in the Social Sciences, pp. 149–163. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Soziologie, Technische Universität Berlin, Franklinstr. 28/29, Sekr FR 2-5, 10587, Berlin, Germany

    Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer

Authors
  1. Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DFKI GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Klaus Fischer

  2. Department of Technology Assessment, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstrasse 95, 21071, Hamburg, Germany

    Michael Florian

  3. Department of Technology Assessment, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstr. 95, 21071, Hamburg, Germany

    Thomas Malsch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (2005). From Conditional Commitments to Generalized Media: On Means of Coordination Between Self-Governed Entities. In: Fischer, K., Florian, M., Malsch, T. (eds) Socionics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3413. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11594116_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11594116_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30707-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31613-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation