Skip to main content

oMAP: Combining Classifiers for Aligning Automatically OWL Ontologies

  • Conference paper
Book cover Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2005 (WISE 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3806))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper introduces a method and a tool for automatically aligning OWL ontologies, a crucial step for achieving the interoperability of heterogeneous systems in the Semantic Web. Different components are combined for finding suitable mapping candidates (together with their weights), and the set of rules with maximum matching probability is selected. Machine learning-based classifiers and a new classifier using the structure and the semantics of the OWL ontologies are proposed. Our method has been implemented and evaluated on an independent test set provided by an international ontology alignment contest. We provide the results of this evaluation with respect to the other competitors.

This work was carried out during the tenure of an ERCIM fellowship at CNR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachimont, B., Isaac, A., Troncy, R.: Semantic Commitment for Designing Ontologies: A Proposal. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 114–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bechhofer, S., Volz, R., Lord, P.W.: Cooking the Semantic Web with the OWL API. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 659–675. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dhamankar, R., Lee, Y., Doan, A., Halevy, A., Domingos, P.: iMap: discovering complex semantic matches between database schemas. In: ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, Paris, France, pp. 383–394 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Dhamankar, R., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to Match Ontologies on the Semantic Web. The VLDB Journal 12(4), 303–319 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM - quick ontology mapping. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 683–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Euzenat, J.: An API for ontology alignment. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 698–712. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-Lite. In: 15th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), Valence, Spain, pp. 333–337 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fagin, R., Kolaitis, P.G., Miler, R.J., Popa, L.: Data Exchange: Semantics and Query Answering. In: Calvanese, D., Lenzerini, M., Motwani, R. (eds.) ICDT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2572, pp. 207–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hahn, U., Cornet, R., Schulz, S. (eds.): KR-MED: 1st Int. Workshop on Formal Biomedical Knowledge Representation, Whistler, Canada (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: A proposal for an OWL rules language. In: 13th Int. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW 2004), New York, USA, pp. 723–731 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Isaac, A., Troncy, R.: Designing and Using an Audio-Visual Description Core Ontology. In: Workshop on Core Ontologies in Ontology Engineering at EKAW 2004, Whittlebury Hall, Northamptonshire, UK (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. KW Consortium: State of the Art on Ontology Alignment. Deliverable Knowledge Web 2.2.3, FP6-507482 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P.A., Rahm, E.: Generic schema matching with cupid. In: 27th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2001), Roma, Italy, pp. 49–58 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nottelmann, H., Straccia, U.: sPLMap: A probabilistic approach to schema matching. In: Losada, D.E., Fernández-Luna, J.M. (eds.) ECIR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3408, pp. 81–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Anchor-PROMPT: Using non-local context for semantic matching. In: Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at IJCAI 2001, Seattle, Washington, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. OWL, Web Ontology Language Reference Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  20. Porter, M.F.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3), 130–137 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal 10(4), 334–350 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. RDF, Ressource Description Framework Primer W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/

  23. Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comuting Surveys 34(1), 1–47 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sure, Y., Corcho, O., Euzenat, J., Hughes, T. (eds.): 3rd Int. Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON 2004), Hiroshima, Japan (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Straccia, U., Troncy, R. (2005). oMAP: Combining Classifiers for Aligning Automatically OWL Ontologies. In: Ngu, A.H.H., Kitsuregawa, M., Neuhold, E.J., Chung, JY., Sheng, Q.Z. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2005. WISE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3806. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11581062_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11581062_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30017-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32286-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics