Skip to main content

Multiagent Negotiation for Fair and Unbiased Resource Allocation

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE (OTM 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3760))

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel solution for the n agent cake cutting (resource allocation) problem. We propose a negotiation protocol for dividing a resource among n agents and then provide an algorithm for allotting portions of the resource. We prove that this protocol can enable distribution of the resource among n agents in a fair manner. The protocol enables agents to choose portions based on their internal utility function, which they do not have to reveal. In addition to being fair, the protocol has desirable features such as being unbiased and verifiable while allocating resources. In the case where the resource is two-dimensional (a circular cake) and uniform, it is shown that each agent can get close to 1/n of the whole resource.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rosenchein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, R., Smith, R.: Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence 20(1), 63–109 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinhaus, H.: The problem of fair division. Econometrica 16, 101–104 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brams, S.J., Taylor, A.D.: Fair Division: From cake-cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Biswas, A., Sen, S.: More than envy-free. In: The Working Papers of the AAAI 1999 Workshop on Negotiation: Settling Conflicts and Identifying Opportunities, pp. 44–49. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tasnadi, A.: A new proportional procedure for the n-person cake-cutting problem. Economics Bulletin 4, 1–3 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson, J., Webb, W.: Cake-Cutting Algorithms: Be Fair if You Can. A.K. Peters, Nattick (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Huhns, M.N., Malhotra, A.K.: Negotiating for Goods and Services. IEEE Internet Computing 3(4), 97–99 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart, I.: Mathematical Recreations: Your Half ’s Bigger Than My Half!, December 1998, pp. 112–114. Scientific American (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Iyer, K., Huhns, M. (2005). Multiagent Negotiation for Fair and Unbiased Resource Allocation. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. OTM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3760. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575771_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11575771_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29736-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32116-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics