Skip to main content

On the Rôle of Abstract Non-interference in Language-Based Security

  • Conference paper
Programming Languages and Systems (APLAS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3780))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we illustrate the rôle of the notion of Abstract Non-Interference in language based security, by explaining how it models both the weakening of attackers’ observational capability, and the declassification of private information. Namely, we show that in abstract non-interference we model both attackers that can only observe properties of public data, and private properties that can or cannot flow. Moreover, we deepen the understanding of abstract non-interference by comparing it, by means of examples, with some the most interesting approaches to the weakening of non-interference, such as the PER model, robust declassification, delimited release and relaxed non-interference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell, D.E., LaPadula, L.J.: Secure computer systems: Mathematical foundations and model. Technical Report M74-244, MITRE Corp., Badford, MA (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chong, S., Myers, A.C.: Security policies for downgrading. In: ACM Conf. on Computer and Communications Security, October 2004, pp. 198–209. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, D., Hunt, S., Malacaria, P.: Quantified interference: Information theory and information flow (extended abstract). In: Workshop on Issues in the Theory of Security, WITS (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, E.S.: Information transmission in sequential programs. Foundations of Secure Computation, 297–335 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract interpretation: A unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: Proc. of Conf. Record of the 4th ACM Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 1977), pp. 238–252. ACM Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Systematic design of program analysis frameworks. In: Proc. of Conf. Record of the 6th ACM Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 1979), pp. 269–282. ACM Press, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Denning, D.E., Denning, P.: Certification of programs for secure information flow. Communications of the ACM 20(7), 504–513 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Pierro, A., Hankin, C., Wiklicky, H.: Approximate non-interference. In: Proc. of the IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, pp. 1–17. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giacobazzi, R., Mastroeni, I.: Abstract non-interference: Parameterizing non-interference by abstract interpretation. In: Proc. of the 31st Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 2004), pp. 186–197. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Giacobazzi, R., Mastroeni, I.: Proving abstract non-interference. In: Marcinkowski, J., Tarlecki, A. (eds.) CSL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3210, pp. 280–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Giacobazzi, R., Mastroeni, I.: Adjoining declassification and attack models by abstract interpretation. In: Sagiv, M. (ed.) ESOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3444, pp. 295–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Giacobazzi, R., Mastroeni, I.: Timed abstract non-interference. In: Pettersson, P., Yi, W. (eds.) FORMATS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3829, pp. 289–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Goguen, J.A., Meseguer, J.: Security policies and security models. In: Proc. IEEE Symp. on Security and Privacy, pp. 11–20. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hunt, S., Mastroeni, I.: The PER model of abstract non-interference. In: Hankin, C., Siveroni, I. (eds.) SAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3672, pp. 171–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Joshi, R., Leino, K.R.M.: A semantic approach to secure information flow. Science of Computer Programming 37, 113–138 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Laud, P.: Semantics and program analysis of computationally secure information flow. In: Sands, D. (ed.) ESOP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2028, pp. 77–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, P., Zdancewic, S.: Downgrading policies and relaxed noninterference. In: Proc. of the 32nd Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 2005), pp. 158–170. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lowe, G.: Quantifying information flow. In: Proc. of the IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, pp. 18–31. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Myers, A.C., Sabelfeld, A., Zdancewic, S.: Enforcing robust declassification. In: Proc. IEEE Symp. on Security and Privacy. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ranzato, F., Tapparo, F.: Strong preservation as completeness in abstract interpretation. In: Schmidt, D. (ed.) ESOP 2004. LNCS, vol. 2986, pp. 18–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Sabelfeld, A., Myers, A.C.: A model for delimited information release. In: Futatsugi, K., Mizoguchi, F., Yonezaki, N. (eds.) ISSS 2003. LNCS, vol. 3233, pp. 174–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sabelfeld, A., Myers, A.C.: Language-based information-flow security. IEEE J. on selected ares in communications 21(1), 5–19 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sabelfeld, A., Sands, D.: A PER model of secure information flow in sequential programs. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation 14(1), 59–91 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Sabelfeld, A., Sands, D.: Dimensions and principles of declassification. In: Proc. of 18th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW-18). IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Volpano, D.: Safety versus secrecy. In: Cortesi, A., Filé, G. (eds.) SAS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1694, pp. 303–311. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Zdancewic, S., Myers, A.C.: Robust declassification. In: Proc. of the IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, pp. 15–23. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mastroeni, I. (2005). On the Rôle of Abstract Non-interference in Language-Based Security. In: Yi, K. (eds) Programming Languages and Systems. APLAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3780. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575467_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11575467_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29735-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32247-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics