Intelligent Congestion Avoidance in Differentiated Service Networks

  • Farzad Habibipour
  • Ahmad Faraahi
  • Mehdi Glily
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3756)


Active Queue management (AQM) takes a trade-off between link utilization and delay experienced by data packets. From the viewpoint of control theory, it is rational to regard AQM as a typical regulation system. Although PI controller for AQM outperforms RED algorithm, the mismatches in simplified TCP flow model inevitably degrades the performance of controller designed with classic control theory. The Differentiated Service (Diff-Serv) architectures are proposed to deliver Quality of Service (QoS) in TCP/IP networks. The aim of this paper is to design an active queue management system to secure high utilization, bounded delay and loss, while the network complies with the demands each traffic class sets. To this end, predictive control strategy is used to design the congestion controller. This control strategy is suitable for plants with time delay, so the effects of round trip time delay can be reduced suing predictive control algorithm in comparison with the other exciting control algorithms. Simulation results of the proposed control action for the system with and without round trip time delay, demonstrate the effectiveness of the controller in providing queue management system.


Congestion Control Model Predictive Control Active Queue Management Congestion Control Algorithm Nonlinear Model Predictive Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kalarov, A., Ramamurthy, G.: A control theoretic approach to the design of an explicit rate controller for ABR service. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (October 1999) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lambert, J., Pitsillides, A.: Adaptive congestion control in ATM based networks: quality of service with high utilization. Journal of Computer Comm. 20, 1239–1258 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pitsillides, A., Ioannou, P.: Non-linear Controllers for Congestion Control in Differentiated Services Networks, TR-99-1, Dept. CS, University of Cyprus (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Camacho, E.F.: Model predictive control. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcia, C.E., Prett, D.M., Morari, M.: Model predictive control: theory and practice- a survey. Automatica 25(3), 335–348 (1989)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parker, R.S., Gatzke, E.P., Mahadevan, R., Meadows, E.S., Doyle, F.J.: Nonlinear model predictive control: issues and applications. In: Kouvaritakis, B., Cannon, M. (eds.) Nonlinear predictive control theory and practice. IEE Control Series, pp. 34–57 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jalili-Kharaajoo, M., Araabi, B.N.: Neural network control of a heat exchanger pilot plant. to appear in IU Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharma, S., Tipper, D.: Approximate models for the study of nonstationary queues and their applications to communication networks. In: IEEE ICC 1993 (May 1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tipper, D., Sandareshan, M.K.: Numerical Methods for modeling Computer Networks Under Non-stationary Conditions. IEEE Journal SAC (December 1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rossides, L., Pitsillides, A., Ioannou, P.: Non-linear Congestion control: Comparison of a fluid flow based model with OPNET simulated ATM switch model, TR-99-1, Dept. Computer Science, University of Cyprus (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farzad Habibipour
    • 1
  • Ahmad Faraahi
    • 1
  • Mehdi Glily
    • 1
  1. 1.Iran Telecom Research Center and Payame Noor UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations