Skip to main content

The “Dance or Work” Problem: Why Do not all Honeybees Dance with Maximum Intensity

  • Conference paper
Multi-Agent Systems and Applications IV (CEEMAS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3690))

Abstract

A honeybee colony has to choose among several nectar sources in the environment, each fluctuating in quality over time. Successful forager bees return to the hive and perform dances to describe the food sources they have found. Each dancer tries to recruit other forager bees to fly to the source it has found. Some individual dancers clearly dance longer for higher quality sources, other dancers distinguish little between poor and good sources; presumably the differences are genetically based [6].

Our multi-agent simulation showed that this individual heterogeneity results in optimal collective exploitation of the environment. Under all tested environmental conditions near-natural heterogeneous colonies worked more efficiently than artificially homogeneous ones. In heterogeneous colonies, dances last sufficiently long to recruit an appropriate number of waiting dancefollowing bees. In homogeneous colonies with good discriminating bees, the dances last longer than is efficient; the extra dancing decreases net food gains per time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dorigo, M., Stützle, T.: Ant colony optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Frisch, K.V.: Tanzsprache und Orientierung der Bienen. Springer, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C.: Swarm intelligence. Academic Press, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ratnieks, F.L.W., Anderson, C.: Task partitioning in insect societies. II. Use of queueing delay information in recruitment. Am. Nat. 154, 536–548 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmickl, T., Crailsheim, K.: Cost of environmental fluctuations an benefits of dynamic foraging decisions in honey bees. Adapitve Behavior 12, 263–277 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seeley, T.D.: Honey bee foragers as sensory units of their colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34, 51–62 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thenius, R., Schmickl, T., Crailsheim, K. (2005). The “Dance or Work” Problem: Why Do not all Honeybees Dance with Maximum Intensity. In: Pěchouček, M., Petta, P., Varga, L.Z. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Applications IV. CEEMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3690. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11559221_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11559221_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29046-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31731-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics