Skip to main content

Lessons Learned from Automated Analysis of Industrial UML Class Models (An Experience Report)  

  • Conference paper
Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3713))

Abstract

Automated analysis of object-oriented design models can provide insight into the quality of a given software design. Data obtained from automated analysis, however, is often too complex to be easily understood by a designer. This paper examines the use of an automated analysis tool on industrial software UML class models, where one set of models was created as part of the design process and the other was obtained from reverse engineering code. The analysis was performed by DesignAdvisor, a tool developed by Siemens Corporate Research, that supports metrics-based analysis and detection of design guideline violations. The paper describes the lessons learned from using the automated analysis techniques to assess the quality of these models. We also assess the impact of design pattern use in the overall quality of the models. Based on our lessons learned, identify design guidelines that would minimize the occurrence of these errors.

This work is supported in part by Siemens Corporate Research, NSF grants EIA-0000433, CDA-9700732, CCR-9901017, Department of the Navy, and Office of Naval Research under Grant No. N00014-01-1-0744, and in cooperation with Siemens Transportation and Detroit Diesel Corporation.

Please contact B. Cheng for all correspondences

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rational Software: The Rational Unified Process (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite of object oriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eder, J., Kappel, G., Schrefl, M.: Coupling and cohesion in object-oriented systems. In: Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Baltimore, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li, W., Henry, S.: Object-oriented metrics that predict maintainability. Journal of Systems and Software 23, 111–122 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorenz, M., Kidd, J.: Object-Oriented Software Metrics: A Practical Guide. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harrison, R., Counsell, S., Nithi, R.: Coupling metrics for object-oriented design. In: 5th International Symposium on Software Metrics, pp. 150–157 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tahvildari, L., Kontogiannis, K.: A metric-based approach to enhance design quality through meta-pattern transformations. In: Seventh European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pp. 183–192 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berenbach, B.: The evaluation of large, complex UML analysis and design models. In: 26th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berenbach, B., Hartman, J.: DesignAdvisor, A UML-based Architectural Design Tool. Siemens Corporate Research (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Object Modelling Group: OMG Unified Modelling Specification Version 1.5. Object Management Group, Needham MA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Babin, G., Lustman, F.: Formal data and behavior requirements engineering: a scenario based approach. In: 3rd annual IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, pp. 119–125 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson, M.: Formalism and informality in RE. In: Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, p. 269 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, X., Liu, Z., He, J.: Formal and use-case driven requirement analysis in UML. In: 25th Annual International Computer Software and Appliations Conference, pp. 215–224 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McUmber, W.E., Cheng, B.H.C.: A general framework for formalizing UML with formal languages. In: 23rd IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2001), pp. 433–442 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Riel, A.J.: Object-Oriented Design Heuristics. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell, L., Cheng, B.H.C., McUmber, W., Stirewalt, R.E.K.: Automatically detecting and visualizing errors in UML diagrams. Requirements Engineering Journal (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Briand, L.C., Daly, J.W., Wüst, J.: A unified framework for cohesion measurement in object-oriented systems. Empirical Software Engineering: An International Journal 3, 65–117 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chae, H.S., Kwon, Y.R.: A cohesion measure for classes in object-oriented systems. In: 5th International Symposium on Software Metrics, pp. 158–166 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Erni, K., Lewerentz, C.: Applying design-metrics to object-oriented frameworks. In: 3rd International Software Metrics Symposium, pp. 64–74 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Muthanna, S., Ponnambalam, K., Kontogiannis, K., Stacey, B.: Kontogiannis, K., Stacey, B.: A maintainability model for industrial software systems using design level metrics. In: 7th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pp. 248–257 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cheng, B.H.C., Stephenson, R., Berenbach, B. (2005). Lessons Learned from Automated Analysis of Industrial UML Class Models (An Experience Report)  . In: Briand, L., Williams, C. (eds) Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3713. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11557432_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11557432_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29010-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32057-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics