Skip to main content

Biological Cluster Validity Indices Based on the Gene Ontology

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis VI (IDA 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3646))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the invention of biotechnological high throughput methods like DNA microarrays and the analysis of the resulting huge amounts of biological data, clustering algorithms gain new popularity. In practice the question arises, which clustering algorithm as well as which parameter set generates the most promising results. Little work is addressed to the question of evaluating and comparing the clustering results, especially according to their biological relevance, as well on distinguishing biologically interesting clusters from less interesting ones. This paper presents two cluster validity indices intended to evaluate clusterings of gene expression data in a biological manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azuaje, F.: A cluster validity framework for genome expression data. Bioinformatics 18(2), 319–320 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beibarth, T., Speed, T.: GOstat: find statistically overexpressed Gene Ontologies within groups of genes. Bioinformatics 20(9), 1464–1465 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolshakova, N., Azuaje, F., Cunningham, P.: An integrated tool for microarray data clustering and cluster validity assessment. Bioinformatics 21(4), 451–455 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho, R.J., Huang, M., Campbell, M.J., Dong, H., Steinmetz, L., Sapinoso, L., Hampton, G., Elledge, S.J., Davis, R.W., Lockhart, D.J.: Transcriptional regulation and function during the human cell cycle. Nature Genetics 27(1), 48–54 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davies, J.L., Bouldin, D.W.: A cluster separation measure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1, 224–227 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunn, J.C.: Well separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. Journal of Cybernetics 4, 95–104 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisen, M., Spellman, P., Botstein, D., Brown, P.: Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, vol. 95, pp. 14863–14867 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gene Lynx (2004), http://www.genelynx.org

  9. Hvidsten, T.R., Laegreid, A., Komorowski, J.: Learning rule-based models of biological process from gene expression time profiles using Gene Ontology. Bioinformatics 19(9), 1116–1123 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iyer, V.R., Eisen, M.B., Ross, D.T., Schuler, G., Moore, T., Lee, J.C.F., Trent, J.M., Staudt, L.M., Hudson Jr., J., Boguski, M.S., Lashkari, D., Shalon, D., Botstein, D., Brown, P.O.: The transcriptional program in response of human fibroblasts to serum. Science 283, 83–87 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics, Taiwan. ROCLING X (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lord, P.W., Stevens, R.D., Brass, A., Goble, C.A.: Semantic similarity measures as tools for exploring the gene ontology. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 601–612 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Merz, P.: Clustering gene expression profiles with memetic algorithms. In: Guervós, J.J.M., Adamidis, P.A., Beyer, H.-G., Fernández-Villacañas, J.-L., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 2002. LNCS, vol. 2439, pp. 811–820. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Quackenbush, J.: Computational analysis of microarray data. Nature Reviews Genetics 2(6), 418–427 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66, 846–850 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raychaudhuri, S., Altman, R.B.: A literature-based method for assessing the functional coherence of a gene group. Bioinformatics 19(3), 396–401 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson, P.N., Wollstein, A., Böhme, U., Beattie, B.: Ontologizing gene-expression microarray data: characterizing clusters with gene ontology. Bioinformatics 20(6), 979–981 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational Applications in Math 20, 53–65 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Shah, N.H., Fedoroff, N.V.: CLENCH: a program for calculating Cluster ENriCHment using Gene Ontology. Bioinformatics 20(7), 1196–1197 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Speer, N., Merz, P., Spieth, C., Zell, A.: Clustering gene expression data with memetic algorithms based on minimum spanning trees. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2003), vol. 3, pp. 1848–1855. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Speer, N., Spieth, C., Zell, A.: A memetic clustering algorithm for the functional partition of genes based on the Gene Ontology. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB 2004), pp. 252–259. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tamayo, P., Slonim, D., Mesirov, J., Zhu, Q., Kitareewan, S., Dmitrovsky, E., Lander, E.S., Golub, T.R.: Interpreting patterns of gene expression with self-organizing maps: Methods and application to hematopoietic differentiation. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, vol. 96, pp. 2907–2912 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tavazoie, S., Hughes, J.D., Campbell, M.J., Cho, R.J., Church, G.M.: Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nature Genetics 22, 281–285 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. The Gene Ontology Consortium. The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Research  32, D258–D261 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yeung, K.Y., Haynor, D.R., Ruzzo, W.L.: Validating clustering for gene expression data. Bioinformatics 17, 309–318 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Speer, N., Spiet, C., Zell, A. (2005). Biological Cluster Validity Indices Based on the Gene Ontology. In: Famili, A.F., Kok, J.N., Peña, J.M., Siebes, A., Feelders, A. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis VI. IDA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3646. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11552253_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11552253_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28795-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31926-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics