Skip to main content

Experimental Evaluation of Tree-Based Algorithms for Intonational Breaks Representation

  • Conference paper
Text, Speech and Dialogue (TSD 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3658))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The prosodic specification of an utterance to be spoken by a Text-to-Speech synthesis system can be devised in break indices, pitch accents and boundary tones. In particular, the identification of break indices formulates the intonational phrase breaks that affect all the forthcoming prosody-related procedures. In the present paper we use tree-structured predictors, and specifically the commonly used in similar tasks CART and the introduced C4.5 one, to cope with the task of break placement in the presence of shallow textual features. We have utilized two 500-utterance prosodic corpora offered by two Greek universities in order to compare the machine learning approaches and to argue on the robustness they offer for Greek break modeling. The evaluation of the resulted models revealed that both approaches were positively compared with similar works published for other languages, while the C4.5 method accuracy scaled from 1% to 2,7% better than CART.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bolinger, D.: Intonation and its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse, London, UK, Edward Arnold (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, M., Pierrehumbert, J., Liberman, M.: Synthesis by rule of English intonation patterns. In: ICASSP, pp. 281–284 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prieto, P., Hirschberg, J.: Training Intonational Phrasing Rules Automatically for English and Spanish text-to-speech. Speech Communication 18, 281–290 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bachenco, J., Fitzpatrick, E.: A Computational grammar of Discourse-Neutral Prosodic Phrasing in English. Computational Linguistics 16(3), 155–170 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ostendorf, M., Veilleux, N.: A hierarchical stochastic model for automatic prediction of prosodic boundary location. Computational Linguistics 20(1) (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, P., Black, A.W.: Assigning Phrase Breaks from Part-of-Speech Sequences. Computer Speech and Language 12, 99–117 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Muller, A.F., Zimmermann, H.G., Neuneier, R.: Robust Generation of Symbolic Prosody by a Neural Classifier Based on Autoassociators. In: ICASSP 1996, pp. 1285–1288 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xydas, G., Spiliotopoulos, D., Kouroupetroglou, G.: Modeling Prosodic Structures in Linguistically Enriched Environments. In: Sojka, P., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3206, pp. 521–528. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Fordyce, C., Osterdorf, S.,, M.: Prosody Prediction for Speech Synthesis Using Transformational Rule-Based Learning. In: ICSLP 1998, pp. 682–685 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zervas, P., Maragoudakis, M., Fakotakis, N., Kokkinakis, G.: Bayesian Induction of intonational phrase breaks. In: EUROSPEECH, Geneva, Switzerland, September 1-4, pp. 113–116 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P., Pierrehumbert, J., Hirschberg, J.: ToBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. In: ICSLP, pp. 867–870 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N., Kokkinakis, G.: A Practical Chunker for Unrestricted Text. In: 2nd Int. Conf. of Natural Language Processing, pp. 139–150 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J.: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stone, M.: Cross-validation choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 36, 111–147 (1974)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Xydas, G., Spiliotopoulos, D., Kouroupetroglou, G.: Modeling Improved Prosody Generation from High-Level Linguistically Annotated Corpora. In: IEICE Transactions of Information and Systems (2005) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zervas, P., Xydas, G., Fakotakis, N., Kokkinakis, G., Kouroupetroglou, G. (2005). Experimental Evaluation of Tree-Based Algorithms for Intonational Breaks Representation. In: Matoušek, V., Mautner, P., Pavelka, T. (eds) Text, Speech and Dialogue. TSD 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3658. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11551874_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11551874_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28789-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31817-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics