New Ears for a Robot Cricket

  • Ben Torben-Nielsen
  • Barbara Webb
  • Richard Reeve
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3696)


Cricket females perform phonotaxis towards the specific sounds produced by male crickets. By means of a well-tuned peripheral auditory system the cricket is able to extract directional information about the sound, and the neural system can recognize the species specific characteristics of the song. Crickets use sounds coming from at least four body openings to derive the directional signal. A new artificial four-input apparatus which implements a detailed model of the cricket’s peripheral auditory system, together with our most recent model of the neural system are used for this study. A series of experiments is conducted to validate the new auditory input device and to benchmark the neural model. This study shows that (i) the new auditory input device provides the robot with realistic inputs, and, (ii) most behavioral features ascribed to previous neural models still hold for the new neural model. The relevant differences are discussed.


Tracheal Tube Neural Model Motor Network Robot Model Calling Song 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Michelsen, A.: The tuned cricket. News Physiol. Sci. 13 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michelsen, A., Popov, A.V., Lewis, B.: Physics of directional hearing in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 175, 153–164 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lund, H.H., Webb, B., Hallam, J.: A robot attracted to the cricket species Gryllus bimaculatus. In: Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reeve, R., Webb, B.: New neural circuits for robot phonotaxis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 361, 2245–2266 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Webb, B., Scutt, T.: A simple latency-dependent spiking neuron model of cricket phonotaxis. Biol. Cybern. 82, 247–269 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Torben-Nielsen, B.: New ears for a robot cricket. Master’s thesis, University Maastricht (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thorson, J., Weber, T., Huber, F.: Auditory behaviour of the cricket ii. simplicity of calling-song recognition in gryllus and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J. Comp. Physiol. A 146, 361–378 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schildberger, K.: Temporal selectivity of identified interneurons in the cricket brain. J. Comp. Physiol. A 155, 171–185 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stabel, J., Wendler, G., Scharstein, H.: Cricket phonotaxis: localization depends on recognition of the calling pattern. J. Comp. Physiol. A 165, 165–177 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weber, T., Thorson, J., Huber, F.: Cricket phonotaxis: Females with forelegs fixed off the ground can track male songs. Naturwissenschaften 75, 317–319 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rheinlaender, J., Blatgen, G.: The precision of auditory lateralization in the cricket, Gryllus b imaculatus. Physiological Entomology 7, 209–218 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oldfield, B.P.: Accuracy of orientation in female crickets Teleogryllus o ceanicus (gryllidae): dependence on song spectrum. J. Comp. Physiol. 41, 93–99 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Torben-Nielsen
    • 1
  • Barbara Webb
    • 2
  • Richard Reeve
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Knowledge and Agent TechnologyUniversiteit MaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute of Perception, Action and Behaviour, School of InformaticsUniversity of EdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations