Skip to main content

Autoreducibility, Mitoticity, and Immunity

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2005 (MFCS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3618))

Abstract

We show the following results regarding complete sets.

  • NP-complete sets and PSPACE-complete sets are many-one autoreducible.

  • Complete sets of any level of PH, MODPH, or the Boolean hierarchy over NP are many-one autoreducible.

  • EXP-complete sets are many-one mitotic.

  • NEXP-complete sets are weakly many-one mitotic.

  • PSPACE-complete sets are weakly Turing-mitotic.

  • If one-way permutations and quick pseudo-random generators exist, then NP-complete languages are m-mitotic.

  • If there is a tally language in NP ∩ coNP - P, then, for every ε > 0, NP-complete sets are not 2n(1 + ε)-immune.

These results solve several of the open questions raised by Buhrman and Torenvliet in their 1994 survey paper on the structure of complete sets.

A full version of this paper is available as ECCC Technical Report TR05-011.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, M.: Pseudo-random generators and structure of complete degrees. In: 17th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 139–145 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ambos-Spies, K.: P-mitotic sets. In: Börger, E., Hasenjäger, G., Roding, D. (eds.) Logic and Machines. LNCS, vol. 177, pp. 1–23. Springer, Heidelberg (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ambos-Spies, K., Fleischhack, H., Huwig, H.: Diagonalizations over polynomial time computable sets. Theoretical Computer Science 51, 177–204 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ambos-Spies, K., Neis, H., Terwijn, A.: Genericity and measure for exponential time. Theoretical Computer Science 168(1), 3–19 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Balcazar, J., Mayordomo, E.: A note on genericty and bi-immunity. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 193–196 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balcázar, J., Schöning, U.: Bi-immune sets for complexity classes. Mathematical Systems Theory 18(1), 1–18 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Beigel, R., Feigenbaum, J.: On being incoherent without being very hard. Computational Complexity 2, 1–17 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Beigel, R., Gill, J.: Counting classes: Thresholds, parity, mods, and fewness. Theoretical Computer Science 103, 3–23 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Berman, L.: Polynomial Reducibilities and Complete Sets. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buhrman, H., Fortnow, L., van Melkebeek, D., Torenvliet, L.: Using autoreducibility to separate complexity classes. SIAM Journal on Computing 29(5), 1497–1520 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Buhrman, H., Hoene, A., Torenvliet, L.: Splittings, robustness, and structure of complete sets. SIAM Journal on Computing 27, 637–653 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Buhrman, H., Torenvliet, L.: On the structure of complete sets. In: Proceedings 9th Structure in Complexity Theory, pp. 118–133 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Buhrman, H., Torenvliet, L.: Complete sets and structure in subrecursive classes. In: Proceedings of Logic Colloquium 1996, pp. 45–78. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buhrman, H., Torenvliet, L.: Separating complexity classes using structural properties. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 130–138 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Buhrman, H., Torenvliet, L.: A Post’s program for complexity theory. Bulleting of the EATCS 85, 41–51 (2005)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Ganesan, K., Homer, S.: Complete problems and strong polynomial reducibilities. SIAM Journal on Computing 21, 733–742 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Glaßer, C., Pavan, A., Selman, A., Sengupta, S.: Properties of NP-complete sets. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 184–197 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hertrampf, U., Lautemann, C., Schwentick, T., Vollmer, H., Wagner, K.W.: On the power of polynomial time bit-reductions. In: Proceedings 8th Structure in Complexity Theory, pp. 200–207 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Homer, S., Selman, A.: Computability and Complexity Theory. In: Texts in Computer Science, Springer, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Juedes, D.W., Lutz, J.H.: The complexity and distribution of hard problems. SIAM Joutnal on Computing 24, 279–295 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ladner, R.: Mitotic recursively enumerable sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 38(2), 199–211 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Ogiwara, M., Watanabe, O.: On polynomial-time bounded truth-table reducibility of NP sets to sparse sets. SIAM Journal of Computing 20(3), 471–483 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Pavan, A., Selman, A.: Separation of NP-completeness notions. SIAM Journal on Computing 31(3), 906–918 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Schöning, U.: Probabilistic complexity classes and lowness. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 39, 84–100 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Stockmeyer, L.: The polynomial-time hierarchy. Theoretical Computer Science 3, 1–22 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Trahtenbrot, B.: On autoreducibility. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 192 (1970); Translation in Soviet Math. Dokl.  11, 814–817 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tran, N.: On P-immunity of nondeterministic complete sets. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Structure in Complexity Theory, pp. 262–263. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Wagner, K.W.: Leaf language classes. In: Margenstern, M. (ed.) MCU 2004. LNCS, vol. 3354, pp. 60–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Wrathall, C.: Complete sets and the polynomial-time hierarchy. Theoretical Computer Science 3, 23–33 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Yao, A.: Coherent functions and program checkers. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 89–94 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Glaßer, C., Ogihara, M., Pavan, A., Selman, A.L., Zhang, L. (2005). Autoreducibility, Mitoticity, and Immunity. In: Jȩdrzejowicz, J., Szepietowski, A. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2005. MFCS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3618. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11549345_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11549345_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28702-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31867-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics