Skip to main content

A Method for Comparing Three Genomes

  • Conference paper
Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (BSB 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 3594))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The large amount of data from complete genomes gave rise to the need for computational tools to analyze and compare them. In this work, we propose a method for comparing three genomes simultaneously, at the basic level of their sequences. This comparison can indicate the set of genes shared by genomes, giving interesting clues about the metabolic pathways and proteins related to particular issues. The input for the method is three sets of gene coding sequences or products and the output are the sequences exclusive to each genome, the sequences common to pairs of genomes, and the sequences common to the three genomes. Because each sequence in a genome may be similar to many sequences in the other two genomes, some complicated situations may arise. The main feature of our method is the ability to avoid such situations. We used our method to compare genomes of two pathogenic and five non-pathogenic fungi, and made a biological analysis based on one of these results.

This project was partially funded by Finatec-DF, Fundect-MS and MCT/CNPq.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almeida, N.F.: Tools for genome comparison. PhD thesis, IC-Unicamp, Campinas-SP, Brazil (2002) (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schäffer, A.A.: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25, 3389–3402 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bateman, A., Birney, E., Cerruti, L., Durbin, R., Etwiller, L., Eddy, S.R., Griffiths-Jones, S., Howe, K.L., Marshall, M., Sonnhammer, E.L.L.: The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Research 30(1), 276–280 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birren, B.: Initiative Fungal Genome. A white paper for fungal comparative genomics, Whitehead Institute MIT Center for Genome (October 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Braun, E.L., Halpern, A.L., Nelson, M.A., Natvig, D.O.: Large-scale comparison of fungal sequence information: mechanisms of innovation in Neurospora crassa and gene loss in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Research 10, 416–430 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Delcher, A.L., Kasif, S., Fleischmann, R.D., White, O., Peterson, J., Salzberg, S.L.: Alignment of whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 27(11), 2369–2376 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Birren, B., Berger, B., Lander, E.S.: Methods in comparative genomics: genome correspondence, gene identification and motif discovery. Journal of Computational Biology (in press); Special issue dedicated to Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research on Computational Biology

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kurapakt, G., Sutter-Crazzorala, C.: International Plant and Animal Genome IX Conference (2001), http://www.intl-pag.org/9/abstracts/W15_03.html

  9. lagan, http://lagan.stanford.edu/lagan_web/index.shtml

  10. Li, M., Badger, J.H., Chen, X., Kwong, S., Kearney, P., Zhang, H.: An information-based sequence distance and its application to whole mitochondrial genome phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17(2), 149–154 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Y., Liu, X.S., Wei, L., Altman, R.B., Batxoglou, S.: Eukariotic regulatory element conservation analysis and identification using comparative genomics. Genome Research 14, 451–458 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramon, A., Muro-Pastor, M.I., Scazzochio, C., Gonzalez, R.: Deletion of the unique gene encoding a typical Histone H1 has no apparent phenotype in Aspergillus nidulans. Molecular Microbiology 35, 223–233 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Setubal, J.C., Meidanis, J.: Introduction to computational molecular biology. PWS Publishing Co (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. srs, http://www.lionbioscience.com

  15. vista, http://genome.lbl.gov/vista/index.shtml

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Telles, G.P., Brigido, M.M., Almeida, N.F., Viana, C.J.M., Anjos, D.A.S., Walter, M.E.M.T. (2005). A Method for Comparing Three Genomes. In: Setubal, J.C., Verjovski-Almeida, S. (eds) Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. BSB 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3594. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11532323_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11532323_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28008-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31861-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics