Skip to main content

Why Trust Is Hard – Challenges in e-Mediated Services

  • Conference paper
Trusting Agents for Trusting Electronic Societies (TRUST 2004, TRUST 2003)

Abstract

Design and maintenance of trustworthy electronically mediated services is a major challenge in supporting trust of future information systems supporting e-commerce as well as safety critical systems in our society. We propose a framework supporting a principled life cycle of e-services. Our application domain is distributed health care systems. We also include comparisons with other relevant approaches from trust in e-commerce and trust in agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Managing user trust in b2c e-services. e-Service Journal 2, 7–24 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gambetta, D.: Can we trust trust? In: Gambetta, D. (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, B. Blackwell, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Muir, B.M.: Trust in automation.1. theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics 37, 1905–1922 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deutsch, M.: The resolution of conflict. In: constructive and destructive processes. Yale University Press, New Haven (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rempel, J., Holmes, J., Zanna, M.: Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 95–112 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barber, B.: The logic and limits of trust. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baier, A.: Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96, 231–260 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giddens, A.: The consequences of modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luhmann, N.: Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In: Gambetta, D. (ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, pp. 94–110. Basil Blackwell, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Howe, D.C.: Trust online. Communications of the Acm 43, 34–40 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luck, M.: Challenges for agent-based computing. Special Issue of Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 9, 203–252 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luck, M., McBurney, P., Priest, C.: A manifesto for agent technology: Towards next generation computing. Special Issue of Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 9, 253–283 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zambonelli, F., Omicini, A.: Challenges and research directions in agent-oriented software engineering. Special Issue of Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 9 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sierra, C.: Agent-mediated electronic commerce. Special Issue of Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems 9, 285–301 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hägg, S., Ygge, F.: Agent-oriented programming in power distribution automation: an architecture, a language, and their applicability. Dept. of Computer Science Lund University, Lund (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stafford, T.F.: E-services. Communications of the Acm 46, 27–28 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Featherman, M.S., Pavlou, P.A.: Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, 451–474 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sisson, D.: e-commerce: Trust & trustworthiness (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shankar, V., Urban, G.L., Sultan, F.: Online trust: a stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11, 325–344 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kotonya, G., Sommerville, I.: Requirements engineering: processes and techniques. Worldwide series in computer science. J. Wiley, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bacharach, M., Gambetta, D.: Trust as type detection. In: Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.H. (eds.) Trust and deception in virtual societies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, North Holland (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. mcKnight, H.D., Cummings, L.L., Chervany, N.L.: Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 23, 473–490 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Egger, F.N.: From Interactions to Transactions: Designing the Trust Experience for Business-to-Consumer Electronic Commerce. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Singh, M.P.: Trustworthy service composition: Challenges and research questions. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S.K., Korba, L., Singh, M.P. (eds.) AAMAS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2631, pp. 39–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Boehm, B.W.: Software risk management. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington (1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: The human in the loop of a delegated agent: The theory of adjustable social autonomy. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part a-Systems and Humans 31, 406–418 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dobing, B.R.: Building trust in user-analyst relationships. Ph. d., University of Minnesota (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wollridge, M.: An introduction to Multi-Agent Systems. Wiley, Chichester (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shapiro, S.C.: Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Poslad, S., Charlton, P., Calisti, M.: Specifying standard security mechanisms in multi-agent systems. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S.K., Korba, L., Singh, M.P. (eds.) AAMAS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2631, pp. 163–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Tan, J.J., Titkov, L., Poslad, S.: Securing agent-based e-banking services. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S.K., Korba, L., Singh, M.P. (eds.) AAMAS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2631, pp. 148–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Barber, K.S., Fullam, K., Kim, J.: Challenges for trust, fraud and deception research in multi-agent systems. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S.K., Korba, L., Singh, M.P. (eds.) AAMAS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2631, pp. 8–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Witkowski, M., Aritikis, A., Pitt, J.: Trust and cooperation in a trading society of objective-trust based agents. In: Falcone, R., Singh, M., Tan, Y.H. (eds.) Worskhop on Deception, Fraud, and Trust in Agent Societies, Barcelona, National Reserach Council, Institute of Psychology, Rome, Italy, pp. 127–136 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rindebäck, C., Gustavsson, R. (2005). Why Trust Is Hard – Challenges in e-Mediated Services. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S., Sabater-Mir, J., Singh, M.P. (eds) Trusting Agents for Trusting Electronic Societies. TRUST TRUST 2004 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3577. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11532095_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11532095_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28012-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31859-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics