Skip to main content

Qualitative Reasoning Model for Tradeoff Analysis

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3558))

Abstract

In Multi-Criteria Decision Making problems such as choosing a development policy, selecting software products, or searching for commodities to purchase, it is often necessary to evaluate solution options in respect of multiple objectives. The solution alternative that performs best in all the objectives is the dominant solution, and it should be selected to solve the problem. However, usually the selection objectives are incomparable and conflicting, making it impossible to have a dominant solution among the alternatives. In such cases, tradeoff analysis is required to identify the objectives that can be optimized, and those that can be comprised in order to choose a winning solution. In this paper we present a tradeoff analysis model based on the principles of qualitative reasoning that provides visualization support for understanding interaction and tradeoff dependences among solutions evaluation criteria which affect the tradeoff among selection objectives. Moreover, the decision support system based on our tradeoff analysis model facilitates discovery of hidden solution features so as to improve the completeness and certainty of the user preference model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mohamed, T., Wanyama, G., Ruhe, A.: COTS Evaluation Supported By Knowledge Bases. In: Melnik, G., Holz, H. (eds.) LSO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3096, pp. 43–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuipers, C.: Commonsense Reasoning about Causality: Deriving Behavior from Structure. Artificial Intelligence 24(1-3), 169–203 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuipers, C., Chiu, D.T.D., Molle, D.T.: Higher-Order Derivative Constraints in Qualitative Simulation. Artificial Intelligence 51, 343–379 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Boehm, B.W., Abts, C.M., Bailey, E.K.: COCOTS Software Integration Cost Model: an Overview. In: Proceedings of the California Software Symposium (October 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. CeBASE COTS lessons learned Repository, available at http://www.cebas e,org

  6. Petrie, J., Webster, T.A., Cutkosky, M.R.: Using Pareto Optimality to Coordinate Distributed Agents. AIEDAM Special Issue on Conflict Management 9, 269–281 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization for Standardization: Software Products Evaluation. Quality Characteristics and Guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dujmovic, J.J., Fang, W.Y.: Reliability of LSP Criteria. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y. (eds.) MDAI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3131, pp. 151–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Pu, P., Lalanne, D.: Design Visual Thinking Tools for Mixed Initiative Systems. In: International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pu, P., Kumar, P., Faltings, B.: User-Involved Tradeoff Analysis in Configuration Tasks. In: Workshop notes, 3rd International Workshop on User-Interaction in Constraint Satisfaction, at the 9th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Torra, V.: The Weighted OWA operator. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 12, 153–166 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wanyama, T., Far, B.H. (2005). Qualitative Reasoning Model for Tradeoff Analysis. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Miyamoto, S. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3558. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11526018_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11526018_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27871-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31883-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics