Skip to main content

Conciliation and Consensus in Iterated Belief Merging

  • Conference paper
Book cover Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2005)

Abstract

Two conciliation processes for intelligent agents based on an iterated merge-then-revise change function for belief profiles are introduced and studied. The first approach is skeptical in the sense that at any revision step, each agent considers that her current beliefs are more important than the current beliefs of the group, while the other case is considered in the second, credulous approach. Some key features of such conciliation processes are pointed out for several merging operators; especially, the convergence issue, the existence of consensus and the properties of the induced iterated merging operators are investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Baral, C., Kraus, S., Minker, J.: Combining multiple knowledge bases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 3(2), 208–220 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baral, C., Kraus, S., Minker, J., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Combining knowledge bases consisting of first-order theories. Computational Intelligence 8(1), 45–71 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Booth, R.: A negociation-style framework for non-prioritised revision. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK 2001), pp. 137–150 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Booth, R.: Social contraction and belief negociation. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2002), pp. 374–384 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dalal, M.: Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the Seventh American National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1988), pp. 475–479 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in flux. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.O.: Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artificial Intelligence 52, 263–294 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Konieczny, S.: Belief base merging as a game. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14(3), 275–294 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Konieczny, S.: Propositional belief merging and belief negotiation model. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2004), pp. 249–257 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Konieczny, S., Lang, J., Marquis, P.: DA2 merging operators. Artificial Intelligence 157(1-2), 49–79 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Konieczny, S., Pino Pérez, R.: On the logic of merging. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1998), pp. 488–498 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Konieczny, S., Pino Pérez, R.: Merging with integrity constraints. In: Hunter, A., Parsons, S. (eds.) ECSQARU 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1638, pp. 233–244. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Konieczny, S., Pino Pérez, R.: Merging information under constraints: a qualitative framework. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(5), 773–808 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Liberatore, P., Schaerf, M.: Arbitration (or how to merge knowledge bases). IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 10(1), 76–90 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, J., Mendelzon, A.O.: Knowledge base merging by majority. In: Dynamic Worlds: From the Frame Problem to Knowledge Management, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Revesz, P.Z.: On the semantics of theory change: arbitration between old and new information. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Databases, pp. 71–92 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Revesz, P.Z.: On the semantics of arbitration. International Journal of Algebra and Computation 7(2), 133–160 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gauwin, O., Konieczny, S., Marquis, P. (2005). Conciliation and Consensus in Iterated Belief Merging. In: Godo, L. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3571. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27326-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31888-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics